Sunday, February 9, 2014

The Libertarian Party in American Politics -- Neither Democratic nor Republican


While there are currently some libertarian leaning politicians (Ron Paul, Rand Paul and a few others) in the Republican Party, Libertarians are neither Democrats nor Republicans. True libertarians have their own political party.

Here are some of the Libertarian Party's positions on various social and political issues of our time. Read through them and respond to the questions I've asked at the end of the blog post.

1.0 Personal Liberty

Individuals should be free to make choices for themselves and to accept responsibility for the consequences of the choices they make. No individual, group, or government may initiate force against any other individual, group, or government. Our support of an individual's right to make choices in life does not mean that we necessarily approve or disapprove of those choices.

1.1 Expression and Communication

We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

1.2 Personal Privacy

Libertarians support the rights recognized by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, and property. Protection from unreasonable search and seizure should include records held by third parties, such as email, medical, and library records. Only actions that infringe on the rights of others can properly be termed crimes. We favor the repeal of all laws creating “crimes” without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes.

1.3 Personal Relationships

Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government's treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption,immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.

1.4 Abortion

Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.

1.5 Crime and Justice

Government exists to protect the rights of every individual including life, liberty and property. Criminal laws should be limited to violation of the rights of others through force or fraud, or deliberate actions that place others involuntarily at significant risk of harm. Individuals retain the right to voluntarily assume risk of harm to themselves. We support restitution of the victim to the fullest degree possible at the expense of the criminal or the negligent wrongdoer. We oppose reduction of constitutional safeguards of the rights of the criminally accused. The rights of due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty, must not be denied. We assert the common-law right of juries to judge not only the facts but also the justice of the law.

1.6 Self-Defense

The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense.
We oppose all laws at any level of government requiring registration of, or restricting, the ownership, manufacture, or transfer or sale of firearms or ammunition.

2.0 Economic Liberty

Libertarians want all members of society to have abundant opportunities to achieve economic success. A free and competitive market allocates resources in the most efficient manner. Each person has the right to offer goods and services to others on the free market. The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute
wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society.


2.1 Property and Contract

Property rights are entitled to the same protection as all other human rights. The owners of property have the full right to control, use, dispose of, or in any manner enjoy, their property without interference, until and unless the exercise of their control infringes the valid rights of others. We oppose all controls on wages, prices, rents, profits, production, and interest rates. We advocate the repeal of all laws banning or restricting the advertising of prices, products, or services. We oppose all violations of the right to private property, liberty of contract, and freedom of trade. The right to trade includes the right not to trade — for any reasons whatsoever. Where property, including land, has been taken from its rightful owners by the government or private action in violation of individual rights, we favor restitution to the rightful owners.


2.2 Environment

We support a clean and healthy environment and sensible use of our natural resources. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Pollution and misuse of resources cause damage to our ecosystem. Governments, unlike private businesses, are unaccountable for such damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights in resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. We realize that our planet's climate is constantly changing, but environmental advocates and social pressure are the most effective means of changing public behavior.

2.3 Energy and Resources

While energy is needed to fuel a modern society, government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. We oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation, and production.

2.4 Government Finance and Spending

All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes.

2.5 Money and Financial Markets

We favor free-market banking, with unrestricted competition among banks and depository institutions of all types. Individuals engaged in voluntary exchange should be free to use as money any mutually agreeable commodity or item. We support a halt to inflationary monetary policies and unconstitutional legal tender laws.


2.6 Monopolies and Corporations

We defend the right of individuals to form corporations, cooperatives and other types of companies based on voluntary association. We seek to divest government of all functions that can be provided by non-governmental organizations or private individuals. We oppose government subsidies to business, labor, or any other special interest. Industries should be governed by free markets.

2.7 Labor Markets

We support repeal of all laws which impede the ability of any person to find employment. We oppose government-fostered forced retirement. We support the right of free persons to associate or not associate in labor unions, and an employer should have the right to recognize or refuse to recognize a union. We oppose government interference in bargaining, such as compulsory arbitration or imposing an obligation to bargain.

2.8 Education

Education, like any other service, is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Schools should be managed locally to achieve greater accountability and parental involvement. Recognizing that the education of children is inextricably linked to moral values, we would return authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. In particular, parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children's education.


2.9 Health Care

We favor restoring and reviving a free market health care system. We recognize the freedom of individuals to determine the level of health insurance they want, the level of health care they want, the care providers they want, the medicines and treatments they will use and all other aspects of their medical care, including end-of-life decisions. People should be free to purchase health
insurance across state lines.


2.10 Retirement and Income Security

Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Libertarians would phase out the current government-sponsored Social Security system and transition to a private voluntary system. The proper and most effective source of help for the poor is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals. We believe members of society will become more charitable and civil society will be strengthened as government reduces its activity in this realm.

3.0 Securing Liberty

The protection of individual rights is the only proper purpose of government. Government is constitutionally limited so as to prevent the infringement of individual rights by the government itself. The principle of non-initiation of force should guide the relationships between governments.

3.1 National Defense

We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. We oppose any form of compulsory national service.

3.2 Internal Security and Individual Rights

The defense of the country requires that we have adequate intelligence to detect and to counter threats to domestic security. This requirement must not take priority over maintaining the civil liberties of our citizens. The Constitution and Bill of Rights shall not be suspended even during time of war. Intelligence agencies that legitimately seek to preserve the security of the nation must be subject to oversight and transparency. We oppose the government's use of secret classifications to keep from the public information that it should have, especially that which shows that the government has violated the law.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by
political or revolutionary groups.

3.4 Free Trade and Migration

We support the removal of governmental impediments to free trade. Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders. However, we support control over the entry into our country of foreign nationals who pose a credible threat to security, health or property.


3.5 Rights and Discrimination

We condemn bigotry as irrational and repugnant. Government should not deny or abridge any individual's rights based on sex, wealth, race, color, creed, age, national origin, personal habits, political preference or sexual orientation. Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs.

3.6 Representative Government

We support electoral systems that are more representative of the electorate at the federal, state and local levels. As private voluntary groups, political parties should be allowed to establish their own rules for nomination procedures, primaries and conventions. We call for an end to any tax-financed subsidies to candidates or parties and the repeal of all laws which restrict voluntary financing of election campaigns. We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny the voters their right to consider all legitimate alternatives.


3.7 Self-Determination

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of individual liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to agree to such new governance as to them shall seem most likely to protect their liberty.


Take a moment, reflect on, and respond to the questions below:

Which one (or more than one) of these Libertarian positions do you find unacceptable? Why do you find it unacceptable? Or, do you agree with all of them? What about these Libertarian positions do you find agreeable? Why do you like them?

How would a libertarian respond to the assassination of an American citizen by the US President?

30 comments:

  1. I agree with all of these points. except maybe 2.6 Monopolies and Corporations; if these companies are allowed to become big enough, they become more and more like governments themselves; already in today's society it could be said that corporations rule because of lobbyist's actions sway in congress.

    A libertarian would oppose the assassination of any citizen on the basis of point 3.2 Internal Security and Individual Rights; the constitution and bill of rights will not be suspended even in times of war.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The main libertarian viewpoint I disagree with is 3.4, where free trade is allowed to occur and individuals are allowed to migrate with less restrictions. I believe government intervention is necessary because even now with all the security we have in place, illegal immigrants still make there way here and receive benefits US citizens can't even get. I believe we need to take care of the people in our country before we start worrying about others, and right now I don't think we are doing a good job at that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I agree with all of them, I see no reason not to. They seem to be a better way to live than now.

    Sean Yarborough
    Psci 100
    9:10-10

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agree with most things especially the personal freedoms. The thing I disagree with most is no taxes. I disagree with it because most public government funding things would just disappear.

    Shawn Dunford
    PSCI 100:05

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with the Libertarian Party on most all issues except for economic policy. While I agree that, while not perfect, capitalism is the best economic system we have and that it is certainly possible for someone to rise out of poverty and make a success of themselves using the capitalist system, I am made a bit uneasy by completely unfettered capitalism with no regulation or aid for those who may be less fortunate due to circumstances.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with mainly all of these points. One point that stands out to me is the one about communication in regards to the media and what they can say. I still believe that you have to remain conscious of what you say in the public. Not everyone will like what you have to say and to give people full range to say what they please, well that may cause tension and even violence. Other than that, I agree with the Libertarian Party.
    Tess Hyre
    PSCI 100
    9:10-10:00

    ReplyDelete
  7. I disagree with several of the libertarian beliefs listed above. I feel as if everyone should pay an income tax, because that money contributes to the functioning of our government for national defense, trade with other nations, and other important factors that shape society in which we live. For sexual orientation and discrimination I am strongly agreeing with how libertarians feel that government shouldn't decide whether or not gay marriage is acceptable or any other preference that would deny their rights as an individual. We are entitled to the same equal opportunity regardless of our race, what color we are, who we are attracted to and so on. Abortion is another major issue that I feel has caused a lot of tension in the U.S. I think that females should be allowed to determine whether or not they want to keep the child because of privacy rights. However, if she can't take care of the child, she should try to find a home for the innocent child before she has an abortion. This is a controversial issue so I won't go any farther on the topic than that. The other viewpoint that I disagree with completely is the education one. They mentioned that parents should be responsible for paying for their kids tuition. That is wrong. For example, if you want to join the military, the GI Bill can help you with school, a Pell grant, and various other scholarships that can be awarded to you from working hard. If the government can help you pay for some of the tuition or all of it, then you should utilize this to the best of your ability. Last, full freedom of expression isn't going to work because people just can not say whatever they want due to the seriousness of a false bomb or anything. This is because of the threats that roam the Earth today. Lying about hurting someone or something is immoral and should not be taken lightly by the government. I feel as if the president assassinated an American citizen, libertarians would lead a revolution and storm the White House and do everything they can to capture or possibly kill the president. Due to their strong beliefs on minimum government intervention and maximum individual freedom, anarchy would evolve from the situation. Chaos is now the answer to this.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I do not agree with 2.8 Education. The government provides I believe many positive things to education. The government helps many people be able to afford an education. Without the government giving grants and scholarships many students would not be able to attend college unless they had a wealthy family to pay for it.
    Another that I do not agree with is getting rid of Social Security. Many old people need Social Security to get by. If the government reduced their activity in Social Security I think we would have a bunch of poor old people or old people who can't afford to retire so they have to break their backs to keep working till they die.
    Government Finance and spending is another I do not agree with. Tax does suck when its getting taken out of your pay check but in the long run I think it does help a lot. Many of the government programs do help people stay on their feet while they are going through a difficult time so I think it is good to have them.
    I find that I do agree with most of their positions though. Personal Liberty is one of them. I believe that every person has the right to choose freely what they want to do with their lives. It is their body and I believe they should be able to choose to do with it what they want. this also ties in with the Abortion one because I believe the woman has the choice what to do with her own body.
    I also agree with personal relationships. I believe that if two people truly love each other no matter gender or race they should be able to get married if they want. Their choice is not going to harm anyone else. I also agree that if a person is capable of taking care of a kid and can't have any or just want another they should be free to adopt. There are so many children in the adoption system and there isn't much we can do because it is so difficult to get a child through that.
    I also believe that every person should be able to choose their health care and if they want it or not. I don't believe that we should have to get health care if we do not want it or need it. We should not be forced to pay a ton of money a year for something we might use and we might not use.


    A libertarian would not like the Assassination of an American. it says so in 3.2 and 3.3 that we should try and make peace with the world. And bombing a whole area over what a few people did does not look like peace to me. It also says that they do not like the use of force or the use of terrorism against the innocent.

    Kirstyn Greenwalt
    Psci 100:05
    10:10-11

    ReplyDelete
  9. I agree with some of the points that involve individuals having personal freedoms. Like being able to marry who they want, essentially do what they want without harming one another, and those kind of points. I do not however really agree with the certain points. I don't like how the Libertarians have a one man for themselves kind of perspective. I feel like without government intervention in some areas people would have a difficult time supporting and taking care of themselves. The government plays a big role in education, and social security and government funding is extremely helpful for a number of things.

    ReplyDelete
  10. I agree with most of these points. They are all very appealing, especially based on the point off full responsibility for ones self. I definitely agree with point one that everyone has their own personal liberty. We are in charge of our decisions and should be ready to accept the consequences of them. Some things I didn't like are no taxes. We should all pay taxes. They actually finance a lot of things that we wouldn't be capable of doing ourselves. Another thing I don't like is the social security. A lot of elderly people depend upon that and is there way of living. Taking that away from them wouldn't be fair. The last thing is the Libertarian view doesn't support people who are disable or impaired either mentally or physically. How are they supposed to rely and take care of themselves. We can't expect their neighbors or someone else to constantly watch over them, that wouldn't be fair to either of them. Overall, the Libertarian view is really appealing and I can see why the younger generation does favor it. it allows more freedom and expression and less war and government intervention.

    maddy manfull
    psci 100
    9:10-10

    ReplyDelete
  11. It was mentioned in class that the age group 18-24 years old had a very strong sway to the Libertarian view point, and the reason for that isn't that complicated or mysterious. Libertarians are all for individual rights, personal responsibility, do-it-yourself lifestyles. And that's fine, except not everyone can live this way- that is, it is not possible for them to do so. However the young adults who support this view are the ones who would probably benefit the most out of it. we are striking out on our own at this age, at our physical peak and experiencing personal freedom we had not known before becoming a legal adult. That is my hypothesis on those statistics.
    As for what i personally find appealing about the Libertarian approach to the political hot topics of our times, I am uninteresting and have the majority opinion which is that I agree with the belief of having maximum personal freedoms and support to the limited government that would exist but distrust to the growing power of monopolies under this system. And of course the best example of my view on this is the 'who would take care of grandma?' scenario created by a hypothetical Libertarian USA. It could be solved by stepping up to the plate and doing it yourself, but when monopolies rule your life and you can barely make ends meet by working minimum wage because you could not afford to go to a university because it costs an ungodly amount of money since the government doesn't give them any funding, paying for grandma's meds' and taking care of her full time is a nice idea but not at all doable.

    Emily Cooper
    psci 100
    9:10-10am

    ReplyDelete
  12. I disagree with parts of 2.4, 2.6, and 2.8.

    2.4 - Gov't Finance and Spending: It's fairly vague as to how the Gov't will be funded, just through no taxes (closure of IRS). I have a major issue with the "Balanced Budget Amendment" which doesn't take into account any increases of Gov't expenditure, such as war.

    2.6 - Monopolies and Corporations: I'm taking "Industries should be governed by free markets" to mean less to no regulation of industries. I believe this leads to monopolies, especially coercive ones like those built by Carnegie, Rockefeller, and Vanderbilt.

    2.8 Education: Ignoring the debate of whether public or private schooling is better, getting the government out of education as a regulating agency potentially opens a can of worms. Right now, all education institutions (public, private, homeschooling) have certain guidelines that they must follow and standards their students must meet. Pulling out this standardization of education, and you would end up with major inequalities by region (city schools vs. rural schools) and class (how good of an education can your parents afford).
    This is already somewhat true for the secondary education level (Shepherd U. vs. Harvard), but imagine it at a primary level, where you could be severely disadvantaged in life based upon where you grew up.

    Tim Graham
    PSCI 100:04
    MWF 0910-1000

    ReplyDelete
  13. I could defiantly agree with the issue of freedom of expression and issues that revolve around smaller government. Also, I like having the freedom to use my money on the things I need and want instead of being forced to spend it on useless crap I'm told I need to use it for. However, when it comes to more of the social aspects, I find them to be unacceptable. Also, the idea of if you do harmful things to yourself it only effects you. That is a flawed argument since there is no way to guarantee that your reckless actions won't harm someone else. If you say you want to use drugs because it's your body and your not hurting someone else that might not be the case. Lets say the person takes a powerful drug and passes out. While they are passed out, their young child discovers the drug and uses it without knowing what it is. Personal freedom is great but it needs to be in reason and we must make common sense decisions.

    ReplyDelete
  14. I agree with everything listen except 1.4-Abortion. I believe abortion should be illegal period. No questions asked. The fetus is a living thing, no matter how many weeks along the mother is. To me, it is still murder, no matter who tries to argue against it. The baby is a living thing, from the time is it conceived to the time to the time it is born. Not trying to sound mean, but if you dont want the scare about having children, then use protection.

    ReplyDelete
  15. I think this argument is largely irrelevant because the Libertarian party has no real power to influence or to participate in modern politics. With both the Republican and Democratic parties having the resources, infrastructure and expertise to dominate the political landscape, it will take some serious effort to overcome America's apathy regarding politics. To top it off, one or both of the Republican and Democratic parties will only coopt any other parties' message and force them from power (these two parties have the power and aren't going to easily relinquish the reins to another one). So it will take quite an effort, message and some serious reasoning to defeat either party, much less both of them. One of Obama's aids made an interesting comment (I wish I could remember his name)... "We came to Washington thinking that we would change it, and instead it changed us." If that isn't his exact words, it's very similar and it's true. Anyone naive enough to think that they can make changes quickly to Washington, D.C. isn't smart enough to be able to actually do it. Instead, they need to understand that they're going to have to fight the "long fight" and implement change over time until a general consensus is developed that allows for quick implementation. In other words, a propaganda war (in effect).

    F.M. Sperry
    PSCI 9:10

    ReplyDelete
  16. I agree with most libertarian ideas because they are based so much on personal freedoms. But, I sway away from the notion of no borders. There are enough people struggling in America as there is.
    Obviously, libertarians would not approve of the assassination of an American citizen because the only violence allowed is for self-defense.

    Christiana Hess
    PSCI: 04
    9:10-10:00

    ReplyDelete
  17. I agree with most of these points. Libertarians live independent lifestyles. But not everyone is capable of living that way. Our education system wouldn't be where it's at today if we allowed some schools to be managed locally as libertarians want it to be. At least I know my hometown school system relies on the government funding for a lot. I feel like a libertarian wouldn't really do much in response to the assassination of an American citizen unless the president was causing harm to each individual, due to their beliefs of violence only needed for self defense. After all these libertarian discussions, I'm pretty on board with the whole maximum individual freedom, minimum government intervention.

    Cassidy Rao
    PSCI 100:05
    10:10 - 11:00

    ReplyDelete
  18. I agree with a lot of these libertarian policies instead of disagreeing. One of the few policies I don't agree on is 1.4 Abortion. I am strict on pro-life issues, so my opinion is completely the opposite of what a libertarian believes in. I do agree with the libertarian perspective that we should have complete freedom and be able to express how we feel. We should not be watched by the government at any given time, and we shouldn't be focusing on issues of race, age, gender, or sexual orientation. I also believe that the country should not harm any other country unless it's for defense. Libertarians would NOT be okay with the assassination of a US citizen by the president unless the president was just trying to defend their self.

    ReplyDelete
  19. I disagree most with 2.10 and 3.4. I think its important for us to take care of our elders through retirement funding. The elderly can't work anymore due to there age usually and bodies just can't function, to jut let them die or go into poverty isn't right, after they have did there part for the country. I also think we need to focus on us a nation. Opening borders will just add more confusion and take away more for us citizens. The u.s does a poor job now with border control.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I pretty much agree with them all, they make clear logical sense.
    Libertarians would not agree with the assassination of a citizen

    Kenneth Blosser
    Psci 100
    9:10-10

    ReplyDelete
  21. For many of these I do not have a problem with. On the other hand there are a couple of issues that I disagree with. I strongly disagree with 2.8 that deals with education. I feel that education should not be handled locally, and the government should control education. The government provides many students with financial aid, which helps them pay for college. With government not being in control of education and providing financial aid, many would not be able to afford college. I also, found 3.4 which is about migration to be unacceptable. I don't like the idea about having open borders. I feel that will lead to more harm then it will do well for us. I strongly agree with the libertarian's stance on abortion. I believe each person should have his or her own opinion on this issue.
    A Libertarian would be against the assassination of a US citizen by the president. They do not stand for this type of violence.

    Grant Davis
    MWF 10:10-11
    PSCI 100:05

    ReplyDelete
  22. I agree with most of these views, and i strongly agree with the crime and justice sections. As a criminal justice major I personally feel that due process and other rights that citizens have are very important and violations of these directly affect a persons freedom. (Patriot act) I diagree with the engery policy, because the government, in my opinion, needs to be involved in order to regulate safety properly and to prevent inflation of the energy services needed.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I agree with a majority of the views of a libertarian, however not all. I have an issue with 1.5 when it comes in terms of drugs. With it legal to take powerful drugs, they may only be harming themselves but it could eventually bring down a nation or hurt others. If a majority of a nation was hooked on pain meds or other powerful drugs, America would not be such a strong nation. Also if a person is on them, their decision making could be affected and they could cause harm to others.
    A libertarian would have a major issue with the President ordering an assassination to a US citizen because they do not tolerate violence, unless in self defense, and the President would not have the power to do that.

    ReplyDelete
  24. With all of the points stated above I do agree with all of them but a few. The couple I don't agree with go hand and hand with each other. The main one I don't agree with is 2.8 Education. I do not agree with it because I believe that public schools give every child a chance to get an education. If there weren't public schools and parents had to pay for each of their children to get an education, whether is elementary school, middle school, high school or even college. The government helps a lot of unfortunate people get an education by providing loans and scholarships. But another point stated above the goes along with this is taxes. Without us paying taxes the government wouldn't have the money to provide us with for our education. So a lot of the points stated above tie into one another. If you want to get rid of one most likely you will be getting rid of another that you feel strongly about keeping.

    As for how a Libertarian would feel about the assassination of a US citizen by the president, obviously they would not stand or tolerate this type of violence. Like one of the points stated above they believe in self defense. So only defend yourself, never be the one to attack first.

    Amber Myers
    PSCI 100:05

    ReplyDelete
  25. I agree with just about every point to be honest. It's time for people to have some self responsibility in this country without the government doing everything for them or telling them how to live. People don't need the government to steal their money and then "save" it for them when they come to retirement age. Are we made up of mentally ill people that can't fend for themselves or make their own decisions? That's not the country this should be...... We need to step it up and act like strong people again. It would be nice to have a life where people aren't always trying to put their noses in each others lives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nathan Lewellyn

      PSCI 100.04

      Forget this

      Delete
    2. Forgot****

      Delete
  26. A bit surprising to myself, but I found most of the libertarian viewpoints extremely appealing. I suppose that the only thing that doesn't sit well with me is the emphasis on people fending for themseles and if something doesn't work out, then oh well. I wouldn't mind this view point from an anarchist, since they're about complete independence without intervention. But if a libertarian thinks there should be a government, then I believe part of the government's responsibility is to provide opportunities and aid to the people. Maybe not extensive aid, but at least SOMETHING.

    I don't believe that humans will voluntarily help each other out and consistently provide for each other. People aren't that reliable--and neither is the government, but if there is to be a government it should provide on certain issues. Otherwise that seems a bit inhumane to turn a blind eye. What is the purpose of having a higher authority who cannot care for you.

    Nanette Yessler
    PSCI 100:04
    9:10-10:00AM

    ReplyDelete
  27. The libertarian perspective is very interesting and makes me think. I like the way libertarians think although i would not like a full libertarian government. I do believe that people will voluntarily help each other out but not as consistant as people may think. The libertarian perspective is very much good but has many flaws just like any other view.

    ReplyDelete
  28. I don't agree with the libertarian party in most ways. Not anything against the party's ideas, but I think it can be contradicting and here's why; The message of libertarianism shifts from noble self-responsibility to a “YOLO” mindset.. and instead of working toward something better, the focus rests on giving off a “Do whatever you want as long as you don't kill anyone" type of situation, which doesn't make people more responsible. We don't know what people are capable of, and sometimes we don't even know what we are capable of and I think there needs to be boundaries set in place by a government
    Carrie Maggio
    PSCI
    9:10-10:00am

    ReplyDelete