Monday, September 22, 2014

Libertarian Politics and What that Means for Law


While there are currently some libertarian leaning politicians (Ron Paul, Rand Paul and a few others) in the Republican Party, Libertarians are neither Democrats nor Republicans. True libertarians have their own political party.

Here are some of the Libertarian Party's positions on various social and political issues of our time. Read through them and respond to the questions I've asked at the end of the blog post.

1.0 Personal Liberty

Individuals should be free to make choices for themselves and to accept responsibility for the consequences of the choices they make. No individual, group, or government may initiate force against any other individual, group, or government. Our support of an individual's right to make choices in life does not mean that we necessarily approve or disapprove of those choices.

1.1 Expression and Communication

We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

1.2 Personal Privacy

Libertarians support the rights recognized by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, and property. Protection from unreasonable search and seizure should include records held by third parties, such as email, medical, and library records. Only actions that infringe on the rights of others can properly be termed crimes. We favor the repeal of all laws creating “crimes” without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes.

1.3 Personal Relationships

Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government's treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption,immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.

1.4 Abortion

Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.

1.5 Crime and Justice

Government exists to protect the rights of every individual including life, liberty and property. Criminal laws should be limited to violation of the rights of others through force or fraud, or deliberate actions that place others involuntarily at significant risk of harm. Individuals retain the right to voluntarily assume risk of harm to themselves. We support restitution of the victim to the fullest degree possible at the expense of the criminal or the negligent wrongdoer. We oppose reduction of constitutional safeguards of the rights of the criminally accused. The rights of due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty, must not be denied. We assert the common-law right of juries to judge not only the facts but also the justice of the law.

1.6 Self-Defense

The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense.
We oppose all laws at any level of government requiring registration of, or restricting, the ownership, manufacture, or transfer or sale of firearms or ammunition.

2.0 Economic Liberty

Libertarians want all members of society to have abundant opportunities to achieve economic success. A free and competitive market allocates resources in the most efficient manner. Each person has the right to offer goods and services to others on the free market. The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute
wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society.


2.1 Property and Contract

Property rights are entitled to the same protection as all other human rights. The owners of property have the full right to control, use, dispose of, or in any manner enjoy, their property without interference, until and unless the exercise of their control infringes the valid rights of others. We oppose all controls on wages, prices, rents, profits, production, and interest rates. We advocate the repeal of all laws banning or restricting the advertising of prices, products, or services. We oppose all violations of the right to private property, liberty of contract, and freedom of trade. The right to trade includes the right not to trade — for any reasons whatsoever. Where property, including land, has been taken from its rightful owners by the government or private action in violation of individual rights, we favor restitution to the rightful owners.


2.2 Environment

We support a clean and healthy environment and sensible use of our natural resources. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Pollution and misuse of resources cause damage to our ecosystem. Governments, unlike private businesses, are unaccountable for such damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights in resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. We realize that our planet's climate is constantly changing, but environmental advocates and social pressure are the most effective means of changing public behavior.

2.3 Energy and Resources

While energy is needed to fuel a modern society, government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. We oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation, and production.

2.4 Government Finance and Spending

All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes.

2.5 Money and Financial Markets

We favor free-market banking, with unrestricted competition among banks and depository institutions of all types. Individuals engaged in voluntary exchange should be free to use as money any mutually agreeable commodity or item. We support a halt to inflationary monetary policies and unconstitutional legal tender laws.


2.6 Monopolies and Corporations

We defend the right of individuals to form corporations, cooperatives and other types of companies based on voluntary association. We seek to divest government of all functions that can be provided by non-governmental organizations or private individuals. We oppose government subsidies to business, labor, or any other special interest. Industries should be governed by free markets.

2.7 Labor Markets

We support repeal of all laws which impede the ability of any person to find employment. We oppose government-fostered forced retirement. We support the right of free persons to associate or not associate in labor unions, and an employer should have the right to recognize or refuse to recognize a union. We oppose government interference in bargaining, such as compulsory arbitration or imposing an obligation to bargain.

2.8 Education

Education, like any other service, is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Schools should be managed locally to achieve greater accountability and parental involvement. Recognizing that the education of children is inextricably linked to moral values, we would return authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. In particular, parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children's education.


2.9 Health Care

We favor restoring and reviving a free market health care system. We recognize the freedom of individuals to determine the level of health insurance they want, the level of health care they want, the care providers they want, the medicines and treatments they will use and all other aspects of their medical care, including end-of-life decisions. People should be free to purchase health
insurance across state lines.


2.10 Retirement and Income Security

Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Libertarians would phase out the current government-sponsored Social Security system and transition to a private voluntary system. The proper and most effective source of help for the poor is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals. We believe members of society will become more charitable and civil society will be strengthened as government reduces its activity in this realm.

3.0 Securing Liberty

The protection of individual rights is the only proper purpose of government. Government is constitutionally limited so as to prevent the infringement of individual rights by the government itself. The principle of non-initiation of force should guide the relationships between governments.

3.1 National Defense

We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. We oppose any form of compulsory national service.

3.2 Internal Security and Individual Rights

The defense of the country requires that we have adequate intelligence to detect and to counter threats to domestic security. This requirement must not take priority over maintaining the civil liberties of our citizens. The Constitution and Bill of Rights shall not be suspended even during time of war. Intelligence agencies that legitimately seek to preserve the security of the nation must be subject to oversight and transparency. We oppose the government's use of secret classifications to keep from the public information that it should have, especially that which shows that the government has violated the law.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by
political or revolutionary groups.

3.4 Free Trade and Migration

We support the removal of governmental impediments to free trade. Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders. However, we support control over the entry into our country of foreign nationals who pose a credible threat to security, health or property.


3.5 Rights and Discrimination

We condemn bigotry as irrational and repugnant. Government should not deny or abridge any individual's rights based on sex, wealth, race, color, creed, age, national origin, personal habits, political preference or sexual orientation. Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs.

3.6 Representative Government

We support electoral systems that are more representative of the electorate at the federal, state and local levels. As private voluntary groups, political parties should be allowed to establish their own rules for nomination procedures, primaries and conventions. We call for an end to any tax-financed subsidies to candidates or parties and the repeal of all laws which restrict voluntary financing of election campaigns. We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny the voters their right to consider all legitimate alternatives.


3.7 Self-Determination

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of individual liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to agree to such new governance as to them shall seem most likely to protect their liberty.


Take a moment, reflect on, and respond to the questions below:

Which one (or more than one) of these Libertarian positions do you find unacceptable? Why do you find it unacceptable? Or, do you agree with all of them? What about these Libertarian positions do you find agreeable? Why do you like them?

How would a libertarian respond to the assassination of an American citizen by the US President?

36 comments:

  1. The main position that I have trouble with is "personal relationships" I believe that marriage should be defined as being between one man and one woman, with no exceptions. I realize that many people find this to be acceptable, which is fine. I just look at marriage in this way and only this way. Many of these views I support, however. I would like to examine 2 in particular. I like the Libertarian position on Healthcare and Labor Markets. I believe that the healthcare system should be out of the hands of the government and should be restored to a free market system. The government is spending far too much money on redefining how the healthcare system operates. Furthermore, many of the people who had great healthcare before are suffering so that "everyone can have healthcare." Notice the scare-quotes. As for the Labor Market, I believe that all people should have a chance to bid on employment opportunities, not just labor unions. For instance, I am for West Virginia being a Right to Work State. This is aligned with how the Libertarians feel about the Labor Market. In general, I enjoy how much emphasis the Libertarians have on the free market throughout America.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Could not agree more with your view on healthcare!

      Delete
    2. Ben Gregory PSCI 100.02September 26, 2014 at 7:35 PM

      I have to disagree with both of your opinions but I think that they are both valid points with some evidence supporting both of them. I agree with you that the free market and competiton are good on the healthcare system. That is why I feel that the federal government should have its own public option. That way it will be better to see if the public sector orthe private sector has a better healthcare plan. On the labor issue I think that the right to work appeal means that the businesses will have total leverage over collective bargaining and make working conditions worse over time. That is why I disagree with a lot of libertarian views.

      Delete
    3. If you would like to compare healthcare systems then look at how it is right now while the government has taken grasp. Higher deductibles and premiums with shitty healthcare is not exactly ideal. Unless you are a part of the 7% of Americans who had nothing before then government healthcare is pathetic. Sorry 93% but you are worse off while paying more... Oh and you HAVE to pay for a 'healthcare' plan. As for the labor issue, you don't have to work where you don't want to. If you think conditions are bad then don't apply. I personally worked for AWC which is non-union. This employer had much better working conditions than anywhere I had ever worked in the past. I was treated better at this non-union job than any union one.

      Delete
  2. First of all, I love the ending picture. I agree with most of these views accept for one. The one about abortion I cannot agree with simply because I view it as murder. The other day in class you were talking about what makes a person and how people view what a person is can vary based on their opinions. Well in my opinion a person is a human being the moment is has a heart beat and can feel. I agree that woman can do what they want with their bodies. However, the moment they are pregnant it is not only their body. They are sharing it with another human being. And while I agree with most of these, one that I agree with more than the rest is our need for more involvement in the protection of our environment. Big companies are more concerned with making money than they are about the impact they are having on the environment and one day there is going to be too much damage to fix.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Big companies are more concerned with make money! I do believe that some of them would impact our environment any way possible if it meant more money in their pockets.

      Delete
  3. I mostly agree with all of these except the "abortion" and "personal relationships" part. In my mind, and through what I believe.. I see marriage as a man and a woman coming together as one. Many people might disagree with me, which is fine, but this is what I believe. Also, when I read the part about abortion, I had to disagree. I find abortion the same as murder. I know lot of people may disagree.. especially women but I find it UN-moral. Most of the other ones I agree with though. I do feel though that the government still has too much control over our lives and that they should stay out of personal matters.
    Seth Myers PSCI 100.3

    ReplyDelete
  4. Love the picture at the end! I have to say to I agree on pretty much everything listed above. I know that many people to not agree with me or see things like I do and that's ok. I guess I have the true libertarian attitude of "don't hurt me and don't touch my stuff". What people do with themselves is their business. Basically, what you do in your private life does not affect my life at all. I completely agree that the government needs to stay out of healthcare. I really liked the "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution provided that it is balanced by NOT raising taxes. As to the last question; "How would a libertarian respond to the assassination of an American citizen by the US President? First I think there needs to be more information before that can really be answered. Was that US President defending him/her self or their family? If so, than the President has every-right to defend themselves. If that President shot the citizen "just because" than he/she would be treated as any other individual who has committed murder, but even libertarians differ on this. Some groups completely oppose the death penalty but others feel the the victim can choose what punishment, restitution, or combination of the two should be imposed. If it is the latter, you can bet that president would be removed from office! This was a hard question as it can be argued from several different angles.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I personally agree in all of the Libertarian positions above. Although many are against it, Personal relationships and abortion do know harm to you, so why would you tell them what to do with their life? Yes, it may be against your values or your lifestyle but it is not affecting your views or how you live everyday. You do not even have to be associated with them but that doesn't mean we should send the government in to make it illegal. It is like saying people do not want a man and woman to get married because its against their views. That is different now, isn't it? Just because it is what society expects doesn't mean we should banned those who choose to be different. It is not harming you in any way. The majority of the rest described how those who are experienced should have a say such as education where the parents should have a say in what education their children receive not the government. Because as mentioned in class, the government does not know what is going on in Shepherdstown, WV.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I totally agree with you trying to make same sex marriage and abortion illegal is taking away peoples rights. Even if it goes against your beliefs it doesn't mean you should take someone else's rights away.

      Delete
    2. Leandra RosencranceOctober 1, 2014 at 5:59 PM

      I agree as well.

      Delete
  6. It is true that abortion does not physically harm the person who chooses to have this procedure, however, this is an act that deprives another life.The child did not choose to be conceived but is given the death penalty for being conceived anyway. Just my opinion on the matter. Kevin Hagerty PSCI 100.02

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree on every topic accept the abortion one. I just disagree with abortion just the thought of it sounds unbearable to me. I look at it as if you're taking the life of another for no reason. But the overall picture that the libertarian perspective puts out there seems really nice. But in actuality I don't think that it would prosper very well.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I actually agree with most of the main Libertarian beliefs. While I agree with them, that doesn't mean that I would support a Libertarian style of government. People think that our society can just change in a snap, well that isn't possible in any way. The only way Libertarianism would work is if the world's societies were smaller, and they aren't. With the first point, people have to accept responsibility for their own actions. I thought that was actually similar to the system we have today, only there might be punishment from the hierarchy. The beliefs are hard to connect to since we live in a "Democracy". If we didn't, then I would support most of these ideas. I believe that most types of marriage will be legal in 10-20 years, so basically our society is already accepting more libertarian values. I really, really do not believe that if power was taken away from the government and state that people would just be able to co-exist and be free. People are obsessed with power. I also think that the free market might be a myth, outside of ancient times there has never been a free market. The economy is a very complex system and it has many pieces. There is no way something as simple as a free market could work. I think most Libertarian beliefs are progressive. Most of them involve better rights, fairness, and equality. I feel that our leaders should try to help this country for once and incorporate some Libertarian beliefs in their laws/rules.

    Fred Filberg Political Science 100.03

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I feel the same way. Although, I do not think it would be such a bad idea if our country was Libertarian. I actually think these viewpoints make a lot of sense. Logically I don't see a problem with it.

      Delete
    2. Christopher Hosby Political Science 100.03

      Delete
  9. I agree with all of these viewpoints. I like these viewpoints, because they basically are my opinion on these subjects. A libertarian would only worry about the citizen, if the citizen that had been assassinated had been threatening the other person. If the person was not harming the President than the libertarian would be concerned. Overall, reading this blog really opened my eyes on possibly being a libertarian.

    Callie Long Political Science 100.02

    ReplyDelete
  10. I mostly agree with all of these except "Government Finance and Spending". To my understanding this means the government shouldn't have any financial help with citizens. Meaning no loans and grants. Therefore, most people would not being doing the things they do or have the things they have, this including going to college, having a car, owning a house, etc. But I do believe the government has to much control over our lives, but a little help here and there doesn't hurt.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree with all of them except for the abortion and the personal relationships. the government should not be able to tell you who you can and cannot marry. that should be your own choice. as long as someone is happy who cares who they are married to. and with the abortion, if a woman wants to get one let her do it. its her body and she is going to do it anyway. I personally do not think the government should have anything to do with our personal lives. They should not have to hold your hand and tell you what you can and can not do, to me that is insane.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I agree with all of these except the one about free trade and migration. I believe that yes human should be allowed to go and live anywhere they want but I feel borders are necessary. I think if a person wants to come and live in a county they should have to legally do it and learn to live and respect the ways of they place they chose to live in. For the most part I agree with all the rest.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Would the lack of borders create more of a "worldwide" melting pot of ideas and cultures. I think that opening up the borders would actually decrease the amount of imigrants comming in as well. There would be more competition for jobs and wages for the types of labor jobs, which would loose some of the appeal that brings them here in the first place.

      Delete
  13. One of the Libertarian positions I do not find acceptable is the take on opposing government interference on monopolies and corporations. I feel that there must be government intervention on monopolies,but only for products or services that are a essential for humans livelihood. Examples; oil, electricity, water. Furthermore, I feel that the government should be able to regulate companies on price fixing on same products of one another in order to keep companies from setting a prices extremely high on a certain product, leaving the consumer with no choice to choose from. I do agree with the Libertarian idea on Self-Determination because if we as a people do not take a stand against a government that is doing everything but what is best for the people that it represents then we need to alter or abolish it.

    (Da'shawn Long PSCI 100.03)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Monopolies exist now with the government. Take Berkeley county water for example. The only difference would be that it is a government sponsored monopoly. Also one that has increased it's billing to the public over 35 percent durring the past 7 years.

      Delete
  14. I honestly agree with the libertarian stance. The least government the better. I can see why people are getting upset about the topics of abortion and marriage, but those are extremely personal and highly opinionated matters, and the sides will probably always be split. I personally think its great, it gives the people the choice to choose for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  15. While I don't fully agree with the libertarian idea, I love one aspect of it. I love the fact that people are in control of their own contracts. They are in control of who signs the contract, who has to abide by the contract, and everything to do with the contract. I wish this aspect of libertarian ism would be implemented in everyday life now.

    Dakota DiMagno PSCI 100.3

    ReplyDelete
  16. There is only one aspect that I would disagree with and that would be the healthcare. I don’t know to what extent, however the insurance companies seem to take a “take all we can approach” when it comes to this and our lives are at the will of the industry. I do believe is the free market approach to healthcare, but I think it should come with a very defining list of guidelines to which they have to operate by. Opening the healthcare insurance up over state lines would definitely assist in this process. I am not sure why there are state restrictions in place now!
    Everything else I could fully agree with. I believe that change falls into place in time and like in the book “Welcome to Free America” the society would find ways to adapt and overcome any shortcomings. The bottom line is that I am tired of the government being so involved in every aspect of life. I know there is always give and take but feel that it would be worth the trade-off for more liberties on a daily basis.
    If a President were to assonate a United States citizen he would be held by current laws, given trial to prove his innocence or guilt and punished accordingly to the crime just as any other citizen. His power as president would be relinquished.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I find most libertarian positions unacceptable. however there is one that I find to be completelty wrong. I don't agree with any aspect of the libertarian position on abortion. I feel government should outlaw abortion completely. The pregnant woman is carrying a life that isn't hers, that life is as much her doing as the males. She shouldn't be able to end a life that is not hers.
    To answer the second question, the president (by definition) couldn't assassinate a citizen.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I agree with a lot of these things except the one with migration because these people who come here need to be living by the same rules we do and have to be paying taxes. If they get in and we do not know they are here, they can get away with not paying for these things so they get to live with the protection but pay nothing for it.
    (Dustin Wilt PSCI 100:03)

    ReplyDelete
  19. I disagree with the rule of abortion. I think it is flawed because the definition of a person is not one of a child. Therefore they could murder children and get away with it since children are seen as property. I think that is extremely messed up.

    ReplyDelete
  20. I agree with all of these Libertarian positions. But just because I believe they are good does not mean they could ever really occur. Many people will never agree to them. First you would have to remove religion from government which would make a good portion of the country explode. Then try telling them that abortions are up to the person. Also as wonderful a world it would be without racism and sexism, it will never happen. There will always be people who hate others for their skin colour and history and people who put down genders and enforce gender rules. If you wanted any of this to happen you would have to ENFORCE it, but you cannot do that when the government does not really control people. So Libertarian positions are wonderful and would be the perfect world, but that a is sci-fi utopian story you will have to keep reading about.

    Elizabeth Camp (PSCI 100:02)

    ReplyDelete


  21. Edit
    Cashton k Cantwell said...

    I agree with most of the libertarian position. but i do not think business should have free reign in the market for several reasons. The first is that they only look out for them selves and don't care for the most part how there companies decision affects millions. The second reason being if a company starts a monopoly they could ask for what ever price they wanted to for an item and there is nothing we can do about it. there is just to much decisions let to make that can hurt the public. Other than that the whole idea is great in theory.
    Cash, Cantwell (psci100:02)

    ReplyDelete
  22. 2.9 Health Care
    I take health care very seriously due to me working as a geriatric nursing assistant for five years. I have had to sit and watch my sweet residents waste away slowly and in pain due to them not being able to have access to health care or being denied or choosing a POA that agrees to everything their loved one says but when if comes time to take action is either never around or does the opposite because they just want to keep their loved one alive and not let go. In my eyes this is so wrong there needs to be another way a resident can end their pain or have a voice because for the people who take care of them everyday and see their wished its heartbreaking.

    ReplyDelete
  23. I believe that all of these are good things, except I do believe their should be a regulated tax for Education everyone pays a small amount so anyone who wants to go can. Having intelligent masses is a huge deal especially if we were living in a "self-governed" society. In order for people to take responsibility for themselves they have to have the intelligence to want to take responsibility for themselves.

    ReplyDelete
  24. 2.9 Health Care
    I take health care very seriously due to me working as a geriatric nursing assistant for five years. I have had to sit and watch my sweet residents waste away slowly and in pain due to them not being able to have access to health care or being denied or choosing a POA that agrees to everything their loved one says but when if comes time to take action is either never around or does the opposite because they just want to keep their loved one alive and not let go. In my eyes this is so wrong there needs to be another way a resident can end their pain or have a voice because for the people who take care of them everyday and see their wished its heartbreaking.(Stephanie Hennessee PSCI 100 03)

    ReplyDelete