Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Libertarian Party and Policies


While there are currently some libertarian leaning politicians (Ron Paul, Rand Paul and a few others) in the Republican Party, Libertarians are neither Democrats nor Republicans. True libertarians have their own political party.

Here are some of the Libertarian Party's positions on various social and political issues of our time. Read through them and respond to the questions I've asked at the end of the blog post.

1.0 Personal Liberty

Individuals should be free to make choices for themselves and to accept responsibility for the consequences of the choices they make. No individual, group, or government may initiate force against any other individual, group, or government. Our support of an individual's right to make choices in life does not mean that we necessarily approve or disapprove of those choices.

1.1 Expression and Communication

We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

1.2 Personal Privacy

Libertarians support the rights recognized by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, and property. Protection from unreasonable search and seizure should include records held by third parties, such as email, medical, and library records. Only actions that infringe on the rights of others can properly be termed crimes. We favor the repeal of all laws creating “crimes” without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes.

1.3 Personal Relationships

Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government's treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption,immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.

1.4 Abortion

Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.

1.5 Crime and Justice

Government exists to protect the rights of every individual including life, liberty and property. Criminal laws should be limited to violation of the rights of others through force or fraud, or deliberate actions that place others involuntarily at significant risk of harm. Individuals retain the right to voluntarily assume risk of harm to themselves. We support restitution of the victim to the fullest degree possible at the expense of the criminal or the negligent wrongdoer. We oppose reduction of constitutional safeguards of the rights of the criminally accused. The rights of due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty, must not be denied. We assert the common-law right of juries to judge not only the facts but also the justice of the law.

1.6 Self-Defense

The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense.
We oppose all laws at any level of government requiring registration of, or restricting, the ownership, manufacture, or transfer or sale of firearms or ammunition.

2.0 Economic Liberty

Libertarians want all members of society to have abundant opportunities to achieve economic success. A free and competitive market allocates resources in the most efficient manner. Each person has the right to offer goods and services to others on the free market. The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute
wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society.


2.1 Property and Contract

Property rights are entitled to the same protection as all other human rights. The owners of property have the full right to control, use, dispose of, or in any manner enjoy, their property without interference, until and unless the exercise of their control infringes the valid rights of others. We oppose all controls on wages, prices, rents, profits, production, and interest rates. We advocate the repeal of all laws banning or restricting the advertising of prices, products, or services. We oppose all violations of the right to private property, liberty of contract, and freedom of trade. The right to trade includes the right not to trade — for any reasons whatsoever. Where property, including land, has been taken from its rightful owners by the government or private action in violation of individual rights, we favor restitution to the rightful owners.


2.2 Environment

We support a clean and healthy environment and sensible use of our natural resources. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Pollution and misuse of resources cause damage to our ecosystem. Governments, unlike private businesses, are unaccountable for such damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights in resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. We realize that our planet's climate is constantly changing, but environmental advocates and social pressure are the most effective means of changing public behavior.

2.3 Energy and Resources

While energy is needed to fuel a modern society, government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. We oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation, and production.

2.4 Government Finance and Spending

All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes.

2.5 Money and Financial Markets

We favor free-market banking, with unrestricted competition among banks and depository institutions of all types. Individuals engaged in voluntary exchange should be free to use as money any mutually agreeable commodity or item. We support a halt to inflationary monetary policies and unconstitutional legal tender laws.


2.6 Monopolies and Corporations

We defend the right of individuals to form corporations, cooperatives and other types of companies based on voluntary association. We seek to divest government of all functions that can be provided by non-governmental organizations or private individuals. We oppose government subsidies to business, labor, or any other special interest. Industries should be governed by free markets.

2.7 Labor Markets

We support repeal of all laws which impede the ability of any person to find employment. We oppose government-fostered forced retirement. We support the right of free persons to associate or not associate in labor unions, and an employer should have the right to recognize or refuse to recognize a union. We oppose government interference in bargaining, such as compulsory arbitration or imposing an obligation to bargain.

2.8 Education

Education, like any other service, is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Schools should be managed locally to achieve greater accountability and parental involvement. Recognizing that the education of children is inextricably linked to moral values, we would return authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. In particular, parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children's education.


2.9 Health Care

We favor restoring and reviving a free market health care system. We recognize the freedom of individuals to determine the level of health insurance they want, the level of health care they want, the care providers they want, the medicines and treatments they will use and all other aspects of their medical care, including end-of-life decisions. People should be free to purchase health
insurance across state lines.


2.10 Retirement and Income Security

Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Libertarians would phase out the current government-sponsored Social Security system and transition to a private voluntary system. The proper and most effective source of help for the poor is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals. We believe members of society will become more charitable and civil society will be strengthened as government reduces its activity in this realm.

3.0 Securing Liberty

The protection of individual rights is the only proper purpose of government. Government is constitutionally limited so as to prevent the infringement of individual rights by the government itself. The principle of non-initiation of force should guide the relationships between governments.

3.1 National Defense

We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. We oppose any form of compulsory national service.

3.2 Internal Security and Individual Rights

The defense of the country requires that we have adequate intelligence to detect and to counter threats to domestic security. This requirement must not take priority over maintaining the civil liberties of our citizens. The Constitution and Bill of Rights shall not be suspended even during time of war. Intelligence agencies that legitimately seek to preserve the security of the nation must be subject to oversight and transparency. We oppose the government's use of secret classifications to keep from the public information that it should have, especially that which shows that the government has violated the law.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by
political or revolutionary groups.

3.4 Free Trade and Migration

We support the removal of governmental impediments to free trade. Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders. However, we support control over the entry into our country of foreign nationals who pose a credible threat to security, health or property.


3.5 Rights and Discrimination

We condemn bigotry as irrational and repugnant. Government should not deny or abridge any individual's rights based on sex, wealth, race, color, creed, age, national origin, personal habits, political preference or sexual orientation. Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs.

3.6 Representative Government

We support electoral systems that are more representative of the electorate at the federal, state and local levels. As private voluntary groups, political parties should be allowed to establish their own rules for nomination procedures, primaries and conventions. We call for an end to any tax-financed subsidies to candidates or parties and the repeal of all laws which restrict voluntary financing of election campaigns. We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny the voters their right to consider all legitimate alternatives.


3.7 Self-Determination

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of individual liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to agree to such new governance as to them shall seem most likely to protect their liberty.


Take a moment, reflect on, and respond to the questions below:

Which one (or more than one) of these Libertarian positions do you find unacceptable? Why do you find it unacceptable? Or, do you agree with all of them? What about these Libertarian positions do you find agreeable? Why do you like them?

How would a libertarian respond to the assassination of an American citizen by the US President?

23 comments:

  1. I definitely have to say, after reading all of the Libertarian positions, I agree with a majority of them. I think I like a lot of them because there is so much individual freedom and the government is not getting into anyone’s business. One that I really liked was the first one, Personal Liberty. This is pretty much saying that everyone will make their own choices and if they make a wrong choice they will accept the consequences. An individual is free to do what they want and as long as they do not harm anyone, there should be no issues. Everyone will keep to their self and not worry about what everyone else is doing. I do think that people should have that freedom. I also agree with Personal Privacy and Personal Relationships. Like I said before, I do think people should have that freedom to do as they please in their personal life. If someone wants to do drugs, then they should be able to because that’s their life. As long as they are not causing harm to anyone else, I don’t see an issue with it. I have to say that most of these positions sound good to me. They look good when written down but I am not actually certain that they will would truly work.
    I am not quite sure how a libertarian would respond to the assassination of an American citizen by the US President. I guess because the President did cause harm to someone else the government needs to get involved and something would need to be done about it.

    Alexandra Smith PSCI 100

    ReplyDelete
  2. Libertarianism offers many superficially palatable political positions, but upon deeper reflection these approaches to government may actually inhibit individual liberty rather than promote it, as intended. The libertarian perspective on education is especially troubling. To assert that parents should “have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children’s education” is to ignore the varied realities of children’s lives. Should orphaned children be afforded no, or inferior, education? What about the children of those who are impoverished, addicts or the mentally or physically disabled? Should these children be punished with a lifetime of poor opportunity for their parent’s irresponsibility or inability to provide funds for a quality education? Being best equipped to make all educational choices for a child purely by virtue of having a child is ridiculous. There should be standards for education that all children should be held up to and have access to. Even in the case of a homeschooled child, the government should occasionally intervene to ensure that the child is receiving an adequate education. Education should not be “one size fits all” and parents should certainly be involved in the academic lives of their children, but whole responsibility for the education of children should fall on neither the parents nor the government. In any other case, society will continue to see harsh inequalities between the quality of education of children which will have a ripple effect into adulthood, permeating all aspects of the individual’s social, economic, personal, and political life.

    Another unacceptable libertarian position is property and contract. “We oppose all controls on wages, prices, rents, profits, production, and interest rates.” Those with an economically advantaged heritage will continue to be affluent, while those who have a history of oppression (for example, people of color, immigrants, and women) will continue to be afflicted with poverty. No minimum wage means that even a measly wage of a dollar a day, considered “extreme poverty” by the United Nations, would be acceptable in American society as it doesn’t infringe on the “right” of the bourgeoisie to assert total control. Furthermore, opposing control on the prices of rent could lead to racist gentrification, raising rent to prices only the economically affluent (often white) can afford, essentially kicking out people of color, leading to instability and economic hardship that will have lasting negative effects on families and entire communities.

    Significant positions that I agree with include personal privacy and personal relationships. I wholeheartedly agree that what people do in their private lives (that does not inflict harm on another) is entirely their own business; the government should absolutely not intervene in the personal lives of citizens. If people wish to use drugs, for instance, that is their prerogative. Of course there are exceptions to rules, and drug use can sometimes lead to the infringement of another individual’s rights (i.e. someone on methamphetamine can behave violently toward another person, inflicting physical harm upon them). However the issue is not necessarily banning the use of methamphetamine, but rather intervening when a person becomes violent (which can happen regardless of whether someone is under the influence of a drug). Individuals have a right to express their sexual orientation, gender identity, etc. and the government should not treat those who are of a minority gender identity/sexual orientation differently than any other citizen.

    The proper libertarian response to a US president assassinating a US citizen would be to exercise self determination and overthrow the government: “Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of individual liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it…”

    Moriah Smith; PSCI 101.05

    ReplyDelete
  3. After reading the policies, there wasnt one that i thought was irrational or not something that could work for society. Basically i got from it that you are in charge of yourself in all aspects of your life and no one can take that away from you unless you harm someone. Free came to my mind quite a bit while reading these and i think if not all most should be more implemented in our society. The policies i agree with the strongest are personal relationships, enviroment, and abortion. Every person has the right to do whatever they want in any aspect of life but i think espsically these because they effect your overall happiness and the planet we live on should be kept in the best shape possible. They are great to me because like i said before they all reflect true freedom and i think we need more of this in society. If the president killed a citizen in a libertarian society, the proper response would be to over throw him and get him out of the society all together. At that point the president would be "destructive of individual liberty" and simply he would be harming people so he would get thrown out by the people or alter his ways if possible.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I agreed with all of the Libertarian positions. I believe that all of these policies seem completely doable. I think that the government does have too much power. These policies limit the government's power, but do not hinder the people. People will be required to take care of themselves, but there is nothing wrong with that. I believe that everyone has the right to do what we please, but the government has so much control over what we do. One of the positions that really stuck out to me was the one on Social Security plans. I definitely think it should be up to an individual to set aside that money for themselves. It's not fair that the government takes it from our earnings. As a young worker, I am getting that money taking out of my paycheck every two weeks, and I will probably never see it again. I also think that the government needs a new budget. The amount of debt that the United States is in is ridiculous. I also fully agree that the government should have no say in individual personal issues, such as abortion and marriage. Abortion is such a huge debate, and it has been for quite some time. But I do not believe that it is up to the government to decide if it is right or not. It should be up to the individual.

    If the US President assassinated an American citizen, from a Libertarian's perspective, we should do something about it. We should either alter it or abolish it.
    Jennifer Reid PSCI 100.05

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agreed with all of these polices. These polices seem like they would be great in place of the ones we have now. None of them seemed to be on the extreme scale, but seemed more to benefit individuals.
    One of these that i really agreed with was the education. During adolescent development it is crucial for a person to be involved in every day society, learn and grow, and to just get there basic education. An education can provide all this for a growing child. Provides the fundamental needs of growth.
    I also agree with the health care, so many people these days cannot afford it because it is outrageously expensive. People need to choice their health care and if they cant it needs to be provided for them. I really agree with the fact that a person can live freely unless they are harming someone. I think this will allow people to live much happier lives and it also gives then incentive not to mess up not only because it would cause government intervention but they can live how they please. It will also reduce the crime rate.

    Kylie Rorls (PSCI 100:05)

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with the libertarian views that support the increase of personal liberty. I support their beliefs that people should be allowed to make decisions about their bodies and their relationships. I agree that we should be able to express ourselves in any way we see fit. As well, I support their ideas that remove victim-less crimes from being punishable offenses. I believe that people should not be punished for something they do to do themselves like smoking heroin. As well, I agree that we should maintain a very distant foreign policy. We should keep our nose out of other people’s business and only help when other countries ask for it. However, I totally disagree about their economic standings. I believe government regulation keeps the market balance. By prohibiting monopolies and regulating wages and trade, the government ensures fair practices and makes sure that the little guy isn’t being taken advantage of. As well, I disagree that we should stop taxes to be used for federal projects. The federal government uses taxes for good reasons. They use them to fund programs that some people need to survive like Medicare and Medicaid. Without government programs, many people would be out on the street. Paying taxes means you are helping those who need it and you are helping yourself because the government funds infrastructures that you need like roads and bridges. Without government projects, the nation would fall apart. I am also strongly opposed to removing limits and controls on who own firearms. With all of the tragic shootings in recent years it is clear that some people should not be allowed to own guns. If we removes the laws already in place, who is to stop more unstable or violent people from buying them? Likewise, I disagree on their standings on healthcare and education. If these things were completely privatized, many would go without a basic education and health services. The government helps those who can’t afford it, the basic necessities to survive. Their beliefs on free trade and internal security seem very childlike in thought. They fail to realize that in the world we live in there are people who will take advantage of their non regulated system. Not everyone is as good as libertarians like to believe. This is why I also disagree with their belief that parents should teach their children without outside infringement. Now I am not saying that the government should tell you how to raise your kids, I am just saying that there are some racist and bigot people out there and they should not be their child’s only resource for knowledge. However, I agree that we should abolish a government if it infringes on our basic rights.

    If the president were to assassinate an American citizen then they would be removed from office and face fair judgement in court. By harming someone, he has called in the harm principle in which the people must protect themselves from. If there is a threat of harm from the government, it should be removed.

    Claire Affinito PSCI 100.05

    ReplyDelete
  7. I disagree with the retirement plan, I think that social security helps many older people with the rest of their lives. And I know that it has benifited many people in the past and even today. I do agree with the rest of them though the limited government intervention into peoples personal affairs is needed. Rights and Discrimination makes sense and should really be a no brainer. I mean we just legalized same sex marriage which is something that should have really been included in our constituional rights as Americans.

    I believe that libertarians would respond to it as a national security threat. I mean it said that for Internal Security and Individual Rights
    The defense of the country requires that we have adequate intelligence to detect and to counter threats to domestic security. So if something happend as long as the government was fully open with the public about it there would be no harm aginst the libertarian views

    ReplyDelete
  8. I agree with most of the Libertarian policies, especially the policies that emphasize the individual’s rights. Among the policies, I agree most with the subjects of abortion, personal relationships, and international affairs. Abortion is one of the most highly argued topics in modern society, and there are strong forces for and against it. In my opinion, the government should not be able to tell someone what to do with their own body. Although it goes against some religions, abortion is one of the main reasons there is a separation of church and state. Let others do to themselves as they wish! The government should also have no influence on personal relationships. Consenting adults should be able to love and marry whomever they choose, regardless of their sexual orientation. Our society has already improved greatly in this area, and I believe that we are heading towards a future that will have less discrimination in this aspect. International affairs is also important today because our country has destroyed our peace with other nations and has attacked others for reasons other than self-defense. If we were to stop killing so many innocent people in other countries, our relations with these countries would grow stronger and peace would prevail. The only area I do not agree with is education. Education is essential for the well-being of future generations, and I think that the parents should not have such a large influence on what they learn in school. Going to school and being educated on different sciences, history, customs, etc. is what keeps children constantly aware of what goes on around the world. This creates individual ideals and morals that separate children from their parents and peers, and this is essential to striving as an individual in society.

    Stephanie Tepper. PSCI 100.05.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I guess i agree with most of the policies mentioned above, it sounds better than whats happening now? But I dont really agree with the health care and national defence policies. I truly believe health care should be free, not purchased, not everyone can even purchase healthcare, even under a libertarian ruled country. Everyone should have the right to free, good quality health care, which the government needs to be involved in to distribute to everyone, citizen or non. It says that you can purchase health care insurance and receive different levels of care, so say a poor person purchased the worst health insurance, and then receives the worst care due to the low level of insurance not being able to pay for better care, that person then dies or becomes even more hurt from negligent care from faulty doctors. I also disagree with the national defence policy, being in the type of screwed up world today isnt the best time to just opt out of being involved with the world and its issues. America is part of the world also, and needs to recognize and know the proper time when to become involved. Not bomb some country because they want their oil. But say another holocaust type situation happens, and america just opts out? What if America never got involved with Germanys reign and helping liberate all the jews and many other different types of people enslaved in camps. People in the world cant just ignore whats going on around them and hope for peace. All these policies seemed to be better fit for an older time, but now I dont know people of todays world are a lot different and more complex in todays age, and these simple policies cant solve all the strange and complex problems that revolve around the current human behavior that occurs today.

    Holly Campbell

    PSCI 100:05

    ReplyDelete
  10. I agree with just about everything the libertarian party has to say. I agree that the government should not be controlling almost every aspect of our lives which it basically does. I completely agree with the individual rights aspect. These should be basic rights and people should decide for themselves on what do and be like. Also I agree with the social security and retirement part. People should have to figure out their own retirement and not be dependent on the government for it. Social security should be removed because at the rate it is going now, social security is going to make up most of the budget an we won't have enough money to do almost the basic things anymore.

    ReplyDelete
  11. I have mixed views on how I agree and disagree with the Libertarian standpoints. I must say that I do agree with a lot of the principles. There are some that I still believe should have some government "say" like abortion and drug use. But individual freedom does sound nice if it could ever work out like that. I am a huge supporter of the United States staying out of foreign affairs. The international affairs section really stood out to me because I believe that we should stay out of it unless it harms our country. So really I guess I can say that I agree with a lot of the Libertarian views but still on the fence with a few issues. If the US President killed an American citizen Libertarians would not take that so lightly. They don't agree with government intervention anyways and for the government to kill a citizen they wouldn't agree with that.

    Ashlyn Ramsay PSCI 100:05

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I would agree that maybe the government not keeping staples on drug use could cause a bit of issues, and while I disagree with government sticking their noses in abortion I will say nothing more on that. But I definitely agree with US avoiding foreign affairs

      Delete
  12. After reading from the Libertarian perspective, I found myself in agreement to the overwhelming majority of the points. However, there are a couple of points I did not agree with which were 1.1 Expression and Communication, 2.3 Energy and Resources, 2.4 Government Finance and Spending, 2.7 Labor Markets, and 3.5 Rights and Discrimination. What particularly stood out to me in a negative way was the Rights and Discrimination principle. It is disgusting that people should "teach" their children to dislike another person because of race or sexuality or whatever the case may be. Is that honestly a solution for the ongoing problems that those teachings have ALREADY created in today's society? Libertarians are in favor of little to no government intervention and I totally agree. The government would be completely unnecessary if our society learned to be self-sufficient and exercise our individual human rights. I also disagree with the thought that any and everybody should be able to get a job. There are a lot of unstable people in the world and to bring them into a professional environment would be chaos. As far as what one does to their own body, property, or belongings, the government should be absent. They are solely there for protection and without the weapon restrictions, we wouldn't even need them for that.

    Christina Marsh PSCI 100:05

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Also after reading the "assassination of an American citizen" article, I firmly believe that Libertarians would be infuriated. A lot of which is discussed is against the Libertarian beliefs and standpoints.

      Christina Marsh 100:05

      Delete
  13. There is some I do and do not agree with. I do agree with most of these. I do believe there should be some more government with abortion. I do not like the thought of killing a human, even though the baby is not in human form yet. I just do not like the thought of that. If these could actually work, that would be awesome. I personally like the first one. You can do what you want, but if you do something bad, your the one that is facing the consequence. There is always a downfall in these situations, but you never know unless you try. I like most of them because I like how you can be free, and you can do what you want as long as you do not harm anyone.

    Alivia Snyder PSCI100:05

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree completly with you. I agree that people should be able to do what you want as long as it doesn't cause anyone else harm. I like the libertarian perspective the best I think.

      Megan Strobridge PSCI 100:05

      Delete
  14. After going through the list of positions I agree with most of the things that were stated. I agree with the thought that government should have no say in what people do with their personal lives. Like when it comes to same sex marriage or abortion or even regulating how someone runs their own business. I think all of these things should be up to each person because their personal decision would not affect anyone else. However, I think that the government should have control over some things like taxes and education. I think that all children should have to go to school, at least until they are 16, because school gives kids the opportunity to learn how to communicate with others and it also teaches them basic skill such as reading and writing. I also think that the government should have some regulation over taxes because without that there wouldn't be money for things such as roads, public schools, and prisons.

    Briah Doleman PSCI 100:05

    ReplyDelete
  15. I agree with just about all of these really. People get equal treatment, a great deal of freedoms and have to accept the consequences for their decisions. I definitely appreciate the ending of foreign intervention. We can mind our own business, take care of ourselves and let others take care of themselves. I like the idea of being prepared to defend ourselves with military, but only if we must.
    I would assume that libertarians would not appreciate and assassination of an American citizen by our president. They expect the people to be protected from harm. Although if the person is causing others harm they would be okay with tactician being taken to stop that from happening.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I find personal privacy unacceptable, it claims that every individual has their rights for their privacy to be secure but its no secret these days that the government tracks peoples electronics and uses them somewhat as a spying mechanism. Now all the policy's I agree with they are straight forward and acceptable but I do not agree with that the government follows all these policy's they have set forth for the citizens they are always taking short cuts and using this to their advantage.

    ReplyDelete
  17. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  18. I agree with the majority of these stated libertarian views, especially those that focus on the equality of every citizen. I completely agree that discrimination and bigotry are repugnant, and that every citizen deserves to be treated equally by the government. I also agree that the government's most important role is to protect its citizens. But, I think the government's second most important role is to ensure education to children. This is where I come to a disagreement on the libertarian view of education. If parents were given free reign on what their children learn and how they become educated, there's a chance that we would have even more illiterate children in the US than we do now. I think it's the government's responsibility to see that children are attending school and should have a set standard for public education.

    ReplyDelete