Compared to any other country, the US maintains a lot of military bases around the world.
According to the Pentagon's own list PDF, the answer is around 865, but if you include the new bases in Iraq and Afghanistan it is over a thousand. These thousand bases constitute 95 percent of all the military bases any country in the world maintains on any other country's territory.
What do these military bases mean to different people around the world?
Many people, especially many Americans, see these bases as playing an important part in maintaining US national security.
Other people, especially those people in foreign countries impacted by US military bases, see these installations differently. For sure, some people see the US military bases as important for their country's national security, but certainly not everyone sees the US bases in that light. Others see the US military bases in their country in less positive terms. For instance, many of the people living in Vieques, Puerto Rico were unhappy with the use of their island as a bombing range by the US Navy. There have been protests in Seoul, South Korea outside US military installations against US involvement in North-South Korean relations. Japanese citizens living in Okinawa have reservations about US Navel and Marine bases. In Ghana, Kwame Nikrumah, an important African politician and anticolonial intellectual, argued that:
Foremost among the neo-colonialists is the United States, which has long exercised its power in Latin America. Fumblingly at first she turned towards Europe, and then with more certainty after world war two when most countries of that continent were indebted to her. Since then, with methodical thoroughness and touching attention to detail, the Pentagon set about consolidating its ascendancy, evidence of which can be seen all around the world.
Who really rules in such places as Great Britain, West Germany, Japan, Spain, Portugal or Italy? If General de Gaulle is ‘defecting’ from U.S. monopoly control, what interpretation can be placed on his ‘experiments’ in the Sahara desert, his paratroopers in Gabon, or his trips to Cambodia and Latin America?
Lurking behind such questions are the extended tentacles of the Wall Street octopus. And its suction cups and muscular strength are provided by a phenomenon dubbed ‘The Invisible Government’, arising from Wall Street’s connection with the Pentagon and various intelligence services. I quote:
‘The Invisible Government ... is a loose amorphous grouping of individuals and agencies drawn from many parts of the visible government. It is not limited to the Central Intelligence Agency, although the CIA is at its heart. Nor is it confined to the nine other agencies which comprise what is known as the intelligence community: the National Security Council, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the National Security Agency, Army Intelligence, Navy Intelligence and Research, the Atomic Energy Commission and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
‘The Invisible Government includes also many other units and agencies, as well as individuals, that appear outwardly to be a normal part of the conventional government. It even encompasses business firms and institutions that are seemingly private.
‘To an extent that is only beginning to be perceived, this shadow government is shaping the lives of 190,000,000 Americans. An informed citizen might come to suspect that the foreign policy of the United States often works publicly in one direction and secretly through the Invisible Government in just the opposite direction.
‘This Invisible Government is a relatively new institution. It came into being as a result of two related factors: the rise of the United States after World War II to a position of pre-eminent world power, and the challenge to that power by Soviet Communism...
‘By 1964 the intelligence network had grown into a massive hidden apparatus, secretly employing about 200,000 persons and spending billions of dollars a year. [The Invisible Government, David Wise and Thomas B. Ross, Random House, New York, 1964.]
What do you think? Do you think that it is legitimate to call the US a neocolonial power? Why or why not? Can you see how foreigners may dislike US military installations in their country? Or, can you not really see it? Do you think that arguments like this are bogus? Is it more the case that US military bases are more a benefit to the locals and their national security? Should the US be concerned with what locals think about its military installations? Are US national security interests too important to consider local peoples' concerns about the military bases?
I believe that the US is seen as a neocolonial power, but it lacks the over arching control and influence over most of the areas that it populates with military bases. The US does employ many military bases, but we employ US embassies as well. They are their for those US citizens travelling abroad. So do the other countries of the world who have embassies around the world and in the US, does that make them neocolonial too? I think that the US overemphasises its pursuit of national security, and commits actions that are sometimes unnessecary for our security, but they do not focus on colonialism. The closest example to the US being neocolonialist would be the Iraq war or going back to Vietnam. In both of these situations the US has been seen trying to influence the populaiton of that specific area, and has failed miserably. My understanding is that most civilazations will rebuke foreign control as did India and all of the French colonies. If you were to look at any average citizen of a country, they would most likely disagree about colonizing another country. Example being, ask a US Citizen if they think we should try and put a state inside of germany or england and make it our own land. They would probably think it was rediculous. Then again, people would argue that the media could sway people's opinions with the right facts or stories. This is true, but not everyone is so easily swayed. To truly point out what I believe, I would say that the US has done and is doing certain actions that portray us as Neocolonialist and we do impose our will upon other countries, but the United States primary goal and focus, is not to take control of other countries or states.
ReplyDelete-Devin Raine
I believe the United States comes off as a neocolonial power. Throughout history, one could see how the United States has attempted to sway other countries into our world of living. There's no doubt that the American government has a secret agenda behind all of their doings. They may appeal to the public by saying they wish to aid a country that is lacking the necessary resources to survive when, in fact, the U.S. is only taking such action for beneficial gain. I can easily see how foreigners may dislike U.S. military control in their own homeland. At the same time, however, we have to realize how we would feel in such a position. How would we feel if an outside government possessed military control in our state? I feel that the United States fails numerous times to understand such ideologies and only ignores such circumstances. No matter high the United States interest in national security is, there still must be a time to look back and focus on the inhabitants of outside states and to worry about their own security rather than being caught up in a capitalist empire.
ReplyDeleteI would definitely say that it’s fair to call the US a neocolonial power. As defined, neocolonialism is “a policy whereby a major power uses economic and political means to perpetuate or extend its influence over underdeveloped nations or areas.” Obviously, the US is a major power, and I think some would definitely argue that maintaining over a thousand military bases around the globe is using political means to “perpetuate or extend” your authority. On top of this, because the US does use its military bases to demonstrate its power, I can absolutely see why so many foreigners dislike the fact that the US possesses military instillations in their country – I can’t really think of anyone who would be very pleased if South Korea, Afghanistan, or Iraq established military bases in the US. For this reason, I think the US should be very concerned with what locals think about its military instillations, because their views and opinions have the potential to greatly effect the US’s foreign relations with those countries.
ReplyDeleteErin Shaw, 100.05
I think the US would definitely be considered a neocolonial power. The fact that these bases exist justifies that. I would guess that most foreigners do not like the installation of these bases and it definitely makes since. I'm sure people don't like another country just barging into theirs and building a military base. I dont think the US would like anyone else built a military base here. It would make more since if the US had permission to do so, then they shouldn't get upset over that. These arguments are not bogus to me, I definitely find them legitimate. People could feel safer having a US military base in their country but at the same time they could feel very nervous because they might not fully trust them. But on the other side the US shouldn't worry to much about what these countries think unless they start becoming hostile. I think US national security is important but not TOO important too not consider what these people in other countries think.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the United States can be viewed as a neocolonial power. The fact that U.S. military bases are located around the world is a good justification for this claim, which I'm sure is the view a lot of foreigners have about our military bases. Although I do not believe that the bases necessarily mean that we have colonized the countries in which we have military forces, I can understand the feeling other countries have, especially knowing our strict foreign policies on non-democratic nations. I'm sure a lot of countries feel that America's military presence is an uncomfortable feeling, just as it would be if we had other nations' military present in our country. I feel that the U.S. should be more open to moving bases out of a country if its' people are dissatisfied with the installation being there. At the same time, I can see some nations with little military force welcoming the United States presence, but I am sure this presence could be viewed either way. Knowing America's love for invading countries and being a democratic superhero of sorts could make others weary in foreign nations, since I know that I would be weary if a more powerful government moved its military into our country. The United States military should consider the nation in which they are based and determine whether or not they deem our presence necessary, unless it is detrimental to our own security.
ReplyDeleteI believe that it is safe to say that you could call the US a neocolonial power. The reason why is the US has bases all over the world and this represents the definition of neocolonial power-by trying to extend its influence in other areas. I can completely understand the reason why foreigner may dislike the US military installations in their country. For example, if the French decided to put a military base in downtown Martinsburg, WV saying that they are going to help the locals out and help with our national security there would be a huge uproar. Not only because the French would be encroaching on local soil but some people just don’t like the French so just them being in Martinsburg would annoy them. That’s how many people feel about Americans and the US should take that into consideration. I think before the US puts a military installation somewhere they need to weigh not only security interests but also peoples’ concerns about the military bases.
ReplyDeleteChristina Haag
I think it would be safe to say, and that most people could agree that the United States can be called a Neocolonial power. Look at how the Us military works. We are so nosey and controllina we have naval as well as army bases ALL over the planet. But if an outside government wanted to do the same to us it would be absolutely out of the question. Our government would probably wage a full out war just at the idea of it. The reason other countries dislike the US so much is because we act like snotty, spolied, entitled brats. America is a country of double standards, excess, waste and sheer ignorance. The US government is constantly putting their noses in other countries affairs. There are just some things that should not be medeled in, when it is not of your concern.
ReplyDeleteJessica Dant
100 05
The United States is definitely considered a neocolonial power. This is apparent because of the military bases we have set up all over the world in other countries. I can see why some countries would not like this, and maybe even take some offense to this. Without the country's permission, it seems like we are just inviting ourselves over and building our own military base. This might seem to some countries like they cannot protect their own selves, and we decided to do it for them. If a country is smaller and doesn't have the military power of the US, then I can see where that country would probably like having a US military base over there. I just think the US should wisely choose where they decide to set up bases around other countries and obviously be protectant of ourselves and worry about our own country first and foremost.
ReplyDeleteClassifying the United States as a neocolonial power is very accurate in my viewpoint. The fact that thousands of US military controlled bases are in so many different foreign countries makes the US look as if they’re using their economic and military control to influence these foreign countries. I think that having US military bases does benefit local communities that are in need on high protection, but I can see where the term neocolonialism is sometimes thought of when it comes to this situation of control almost. Watching how much involvement the bases and us action have on the native people is a good idea as to restrict our foreign involvement with these outside countries. As for personal security for our own US citizens being a reason for extreme foreign involvement, I don’t think that completely taking over foreign countries with military bases is the right plan of action to protect us Unless of course our involvement is entirely needed.
ReplyDeleteCharlotte Marion
Yes; the U.S may comes out as a neocolonial power, but in some distinction comes some pros. and cons. We don’t have military bases in nearly every country in this earth for no reason. Yes, the people might not like what we are doing to their land, but we are providing them aid and protection as a result. Here comes the issue or invading privacy with these military bases, but we need to protect our own citizen plus we can’t just ignore other nation’s problem like that. We are seen as the promising land, meaning a lot is expected from us. Especially in problematic situations like hurricanes.
ReplyDeleteIf the world was democratic, I am pretty sure there wouldn’t be all this invasions of privacy. Due to different religions and belief, no one in this world can be trust with power. I am pretty sure in these entire nations with U.S military bases, more than half of the citizen sees these military bases as their last hopes and we as a nations values each and every individuals in this planets life. The people protesting against it are probably the one taking advantage of the low classes. The U.S could remove all this military bases in a flash, but due to some people in that particular nation destroying it own citizens human right, we have to protect the helpless.
We may know and probably care about what locals think about military installations, but we shouldn’t probably be interested about what they think because they are provided protection for one. It might seem like the military bases are simply destroying that particular nation like Puerto Rico, but we need to prepare ourselves in future wars. Standing still is simply going to make us seem weaker to other nations having a likely hood in them attacking us and probably destroying our human rights.
Frank Oben
I definitely think the United States could be called a neocolonial power. Even though the US doesn't always make where they have military bases their own colony, it's still having a presence there, in my opinion. I can understand why foreigners would dislike a military presence in their country. I think it would feel rather intrusive to have another country's military base in your own country, especially if nothing is going on. I don't really think that US military bases are a benefit to the locals when really we've set up these bases for our own good. I think we may try to sugar-coat it and say that the bases are for the protection of the locals, but really I believe the US is acting in its own interests. And besides, I don't think the idea of spending a lot of money on other countries and protecting them would go over so well. I'm sure we could put all that money to better use here in our own country. I do think the US should be concerned about what other countries think about us having bases in their countries. If it's absolutely necessary because of a war or something like that, then I think that the two countries should try to come to some sort of peaceful agreement. On the other hand, if the US wants to put a base somewhere, and that country is agreeable, then I'm all for it. As long as it's for a productive reason that will somehow benefit our own country and not use too much money on other countries.
ReplyDeleteNathan Arch
Like everyone else, I agree that it is safe to say that the United States is a neocolonial power and can see how foreign countries may dislike US military installation in their country. The US has so many military bases around the world that it makes me wonder if they are there for actually “good” reasons or if they are they simply because we have the power to do so. When I hear that they have thousands of military bases all over the world, it seems as if they really want to prove that we have the power just to station a base there. It seems like they are finding countries that they can just barge into another countries and say they are trying to “help” them, but in actuality most of the time they are trying to get them to run their country the way we run ours. In all honesty, what they do in their country is not their business. We would definitely have a problem is another country tried so put a military base in our country, so how does that justify us putting our bases in their country? I feel that the US government should not station these bases all over the world unless we have an absolute definite reason that we should be in their country.
ReplyDeleteJenna Benke 100.05
I believe the United States does comes off as a neocolonial power. We always try to extend our power or influence no matter what form it may come in. It doesn't matter if the other countries seem to want our "help" or influence either because regardless were going to give it to them. I can see how they may get angry about it because we swoop in all the time whether were wanted or not and probably really annoys the other countries. I think definitely think that the US should consider the locals feelings of the countries that we are constantly trying to help and restore. Whether there is anything we can do about it, is another thing. They have bigger things to focus on so its not likely the concerns of the locals will be of much interest to them.
ReplyDeleteI definitely have to agree that The United States of America is more often that not viewed as a neocolonial power.It is evident our country is seen in this manner because there are American military bases planted all over in other foreign lands. I do realize this is primarily done for our nation's protection and we do tend to enjoy the sense of security this offers to us. However, the people in these foreign lands may not appreciate our military camping out in their backyards.
ReplyDeleteWhile our government justifies this by claiming we are there to offer them protection as well, many people probably find this to be invasive and they really do not want us there at all. Our country seems to have this notion that we can fix everything and everybody in the world and this is just not possible.I do see how we tend to think our way of living and our way of governing is the only way to go. The country is continuously getting involved in drama from other nations whether we need to or not.I agree with Jenna in that I really do not believe our military bases should be planted in other countries unless we absolutely have to be there.I think we come across as bullies and overbearing at times and this gives our country a very bad reputation. I am extremely thankful for this country and our super military. I am so glad we have them to protect and serve our beautiful country, but I do see that we can easily be viewed as a neocolonial power. I do love my country and let's face it... Is any country really perfect? Laura Remsburg, 100-04
I strongly think that the presence of a military base of the united states in a country that could obviously use the help is necessary. Its when we station bases like the ones in Great Britain that i find a problem. Why do we have a post there? they are a completely capable country and can provide on their own for anything they want to do. We don't need to help them and shouldn't. Our government should take an active role in seeing if these sovereign states even want our how and how helpful we would be. Its just ludacris that we use our precious men and resources to help those that don't want it.
ReplyDeleteI think the united states could be a neocolonial power. Although a military base isn't a colony it still has the presence. I now understand why foreigners would dislike military's in their country's. I don't think we benefit there country's but having a base thats only for our own good. Just shows our selfishness.
ReplyDeleteWell after watching that movie I certainly have a hard time answering this question. I am torn... I can certainly see how in some areas our presence is less welcome than others. And it is definitely more necessary in some areas than others to protect national security (though I am sure that is debateable). I don't really think it is ILLEGITIMATE to say our military resembles neo-colonialists, however as far as I know we've never attempted to wipe out a race of people. At least on the surface, our attempts to establish democratic forms of governments serves to promote a more peaceful way of life, for that community and our own. Obviously the question of whether or not that is our place is up for debate, but I personally believe in what we do as a nation. I want to believe in it anyway.
ReplyDeleteOur mission in having military bases around the world, however, does not exactly mirror a colonialist agenda. We aren't there to take over, and I do believe in most cases having a military base will prove to be a positive addition. Despite this I can understand why some areas find it threatening. We certainly would not be ok with another superpower country swooping in and setting up a foriegn military base on our soil. We should definitely be concerned with the local's opinion on the matter and attempt to make peace in some way. I remember when I went to Greece a few summers ago my dad pointed out from the plane where the old U.S. base used to be a long time ago in Athens and how it was removed. The locals really didn't like that base there, and for what reasons exactly I don't know, but I know that it doesn't exist anymore. I just really think that we need to NOT be pushy and establish ourselves as bullies with other countries. That can only lead to bad foriegn relationships which is never a good thing.
-Challee Blackwelder
I do think that the United States is a neocolonial power. We try to get people to do things our way whether it hurts them or not. After watch Rabbit Proof Fence I do see how other countries would not like us invading them and doing whatever we wanted. We need be careful and make sure we are not hurting other people just because we think that we are right all the time.
ReplyDeleteMegan Williams
The United States is definitely a neocolonial power. We place ourselves everywhere around the globe and don't seem to care about what the people that live there think of it. If I were from another country, there is a good chance I would hate the U.S. It is like we don't take "no" for an answer, and no matter what the other country thinks, we are right. We refuse to accept that maybe other countries do not want our help. I do understand that there are countries that appreciate our protection and other benefits that follow the soilders. Where we build a base, there is going to be more money. Also, some countries may be in a situation where the people have no power and the government enslaves them all. These people would appreciate our help. As seen in the film, not everyone needs to be helped.
ReplyDeletei agree with most everyone else when i say that the US can be called a neoclonial power.like others have stated we put ourselves all around the world even though we dont quite have real power everywhere our bases are.I can understand why some countries hate us for coming onto there country. they were doing just fine without us there and we thought we should help them to be better. a good example of this is The Rabbit Proof Fence. the movie was a great example of how someone coming onto the country thought they were helping out the natives but really just hurt their culture, family , and way of life. but i do think that the US has stretched itself to the limit on trying to control everything. we think we need a military base everywhere when really its not needed
ReplyDeleteI believe that the US is seen a neocolonial power because we have so many military bases around the world. We make our power known wherever we are. It is astonishing to me to hear that we have around 1000 military bases around the world what is the need for such a large number of bases. Do we really need to be everywhere? Is it necessary to spend the amount of money that we do to maintain these bases. I do not understand why we need to make our presense in places that we are not wanted. In many instances these countries do not want us there so why do we stay. In my opinion we stay because we want everyone to know that we have a powerful military.
ReplyDeleteI think the United States is a neocolonial power. The US does what it want's to do, and as others have said; the US will come across in a public way that we are doing it to help others but the truth is and with the invisible government, we are doing it to benefit ourselves in some way. I deffinantly feel that their is an invisable government, because we are only told what the gov't wants us to believe, not the truth or atleast the whole truth. I don't know whether it is right or wrong for the US to invade other countries and build bases in their home land. Sometimes things may not seem right or may suck, but you still have to do it. Not only are we helping other people when we create bases on their land but we are also helping are selves, my spreading and strengthening are power...again, I don't know if it is right or wrong. On the other hand, After watching "Rabbit Proof Fence", I clearly see the otherside of the story, and in the movie, I saw no good out of the situation. The people and the children obviously didn't want the US their and didn't want to live like we do, so we should have backed off and let the people live their own culture.. They were not hurting us by living how they lived. In that case, they were innocent. I think it would have been better to maybe build a base their to help protect them and to also help strengthen us as I mentioned earlier. But by no means should we force them to do the things that were demonstrated in the movie. I think that when soldiers/military goes into other countries like that, they should keep in mind the rights we have in our country. Their safety comes first, but when no threat is shown, those rights should be given to people of that country too.
ReplyDeleteCanaan Metz
This is an interesting question for me. It is perplexing. I am not certain whether the US is actually a neocolonial power nor not, but know that it does in fact come off as one. There are times where we invade countries because their government is different, but in many if not most of those cases the government is corrupt and harmful. Yet, in watching Rabbit Proof Fence I can completely sympathize and understand how our country could be a neocolonial power. Now the bases in other countries is probably offensive and disconcerting to the people living there, which I understand. I would feel the same way, I wouldn't want this super power country putting troops in my home, but I do not know enough about the countries we have them in to say whether or not we should or should not be there. In alot of cases I feel like the US should keep to themselves rather than trying to police the country and get involved in everything, because we have enough problems in our own country that need solving, but I do not know how much we force our views on others.
ReplyDeleteI as well agree with what everyone has stated about the United States can be called a neocolonial power. As our military is stationed throughout the world, I can see why many countries wouldn't want us there. In previous blogs the majority of us have said that the United States is one of the most powerful countries, and I feel that others feel that we are taking over there way of life, and might even try to change their identity. After watching the movie (The Rabbit Proof Fence), it was very obvious that the (Protector) wanted it to be a one way lifestyle and didn't accept the common differences in other people. I also feel that the movie was worth watching and truly an eye opener with how we can see the United States and other countries.
ReplyDelete-Elizabeth L. Higgins
I think it is legitimate to call the United States a neocolonial power because we have so much power, and we express that with the numerous bases it other places. I can understand foreigners not liking military installations in their country because they may feel that we are going to try to push our beliefs on them, but at the same time I do feel it helps them. We can help protect them from harm from their own people. It could really go either way. I feel to some extent we should consider locals' feelings, but at the same time we have to look out for those who can't do that for themselves.
ReplyDeleteThose that argue that the US is a neocolonial power have a very legitimate argument. It is true that we have neocolonial tendencies, such as creating bases in foreign countries. My belief is that even though we are trying to help and we have the best intentions, we need to mind our own business. In most cases, we are not invited nor are we always welcomed into a country to establish rules and set up a form of government we deem fit for them to live by. If they ask for our help, then that is another story. It is also irrelevant if the situation played a major effect on the US, or the outcome was harmful if we did not pursue the goal of helping them. But if we are not welcomed, why force ourselves onto another country? It's pretty safe to say the US would not take kindly to another country trying to impede on our territory and form policies for us, even if we are in an obvious state of turmoil. The whole individuality and power play a major role in a topic such as this.. Other countries do not take kindly to losing their individuality and becoming dependent on the US.. and the act of power. Well, that is self-explanatory. We feel that we are the 'big bad US' and we have a certain responsibility (as discussed in previous forums) to help those in need. That shouldn't always be the case, and the US should stop assuming our own infallibility and pushing our policies onto foreign nations. If I was part of the community of a foreign nation being intervened by the US and their policies, I would be offended. The US seems to take the responsibility for these countries, in a manner creating the claim that these countries are our subordinates. Probably not a wise idea, but that is all my opinion. Strictly opinion...
ReplyDelete-Kristi Barrett
I don't think the US should have any part of our country in someone elses, it is just selfish. I see where the other people living in the Countries would have a problem with them being there, I mean it is pretty much like being watched all the time, one wrong move and the US government is all over that. It is seriously stupid. They spend billions of dollars on these bases when they would be in the US keeping us safe from home. I'm not saying take all of the bases out but 1000 is way to many. The US doesn't give a care about any body else but themselves, the bases can seriously mess up people's lives. I mean would YOU want an army base in your backyard, uhh, noo. Your kids ball gets too close and there he goes, getting shot. NO, they shouldn't be somewhere they aren't wanted, they could easily establish one base in a Country to do what ever they do.
ReplyDelete-Tiffany Anders.
Well, the U.S. is a neocolonial power, that's easy to see, and the government has many reasons for this (even though most are in no way fair to the people who live there). The U.S. government might think this is what's best for those people because they are not like us, but this obviously isn't true because many areas that aren't like us are thriving and fine on there own. Of course if an area needs help and asks for it we should definitely help, but we can't force our help on people when it is not in there interest. The government needs to find out what those people want instead of just having the soldiers act. Now there are some cases when the U.S. might need to interviene because of safety and security, but this needs to be handled delicately and not just done by throwing soldiers into a land to take over. That's not fair to the people at all. There needs to be steps and solid, valid reasons, and there needs to be the mentality that we won't try to change the people if they aren't asking for it. Going in and invading a country isn't fair and assimilating the people to our culture is even worse. We ruin peoples lives. I read a book last year called Three Cups of Tea and it really hit me. It was about a guy who went to areas in the Middle East, but he didn't try to change people; he went to build schools and educate them so that they would learn trades and gain knowledge, which helped them a lot more than taking over their customs and replacing them with ours. I think we should go about it in that way. Build schools and hospitals and such that will educate them and still allow them to practice their culture in the way they wish.
ReplyDeleteIn my opinion the US can be considered a neocolonial power. Our government is forceful towards other countries, I agree that the attitude has changed since WWII. Our abundance of military bases in foreign territory does come off as arrogant, regardless of recent terrorist attacks. Have we placed ourselves within their territory for them or for us? If it was for them wouldn't we be trying to help them, even if it was considered ignorant? But we don't. We protect our own before glancing outward, and none of us can really complain about it. We reap the benefits of our countries' dominance everyday with our fast food and materialistic lifestyles. Should we have so many or any control with our bases in foreign land? Of course Japan will be uneasy with naval bases so near Okinawa, how would they not be with the "dragon" breathing down their necks? And regardless of our opinions, the military's opinions, if somethings not broke, don't fix it. Who are we to decifer what is wrong or right within a culture? If it is not hurting them or hurting us (and I don't mean socially or economically) why is it our business?
ReplyDeleteI do not believe it is legitimate to say that the US is a neocolonial power. The point of a colony is to gain profit from the controlled land. I think we can all agree that we put more money into maintaining these footholds (military bases) then we get out of them. We have all these military bases around the world not only for our protection but in many cases for the protection of the country it is in. I honestly do not understand why some of the local people get mad about the bases, especially in South Korea. The war in Korea is actually still going on. North Korea has enough artillery pointed at Seoul to completely level it in under 20 min (this is a creditable statement from a contractor I know that worked over there for a year). So I just can’t wrap my head around why some South Koreans want us out of there, but if that’s what they want so be it! Lets leave and let them fend for themselves! But in the end that would just hurt us, because WHEN North Korea takes over South Korea after we leave we would have to find another place to unload troops and supplies to take down North Korea. Lets face it, the US is the most powerful military force the Earth has ever seen and will ever see. Therefore in the end, when someone gets attacked the first country they ask for help is the United States. I mean if the locals honestly believe it is best that we leave, fine. But when we leave, we make an agreement not to help them whatsoever in any matter unless it profits the United States not necessarily meaning money but also strategic footholds. Places like Japan and nations that we defeated in wars should not have a say whatsoever in if we keep our bases there or not.
ReplyDeleteI'd have to say that the U.S. is a neocolonial power. Since it wants to make as many bastard child copies of itself as possible within the laws that are set. I'd never be surprised if the U.S. decides to take over the world and more or less nuke all and any resistance. It's a nice plan on paper and when written up in democratic poetry, but the truth is dominance. It would be very amusing to see how the U.S. would accomplish total world dominance if it does. I don't see why anyone would want to, almost by force, take over the world and set in standardized copies of itself. It would remove the traditions of a country and the history made anew from a drastic 180. I just hope that this plan won't backfire. All the "help" we provide, is one step closer to a copy. And thus very soon become a complete copy with all the new legal systems, courts, democracy. I understand that a copy will not be that much of a threat, but if the country resists and force is not enough, what then? War? Or will the U.S. back off? I'd say it's in our blood, like father like son, like mother like daughter, like Brittan, like U.S.A..
ReplyDeleteI do believe that the United States is to be considered a neo-colonial power. It is obvious when you look at the facts, such as having over one thousand military bases in other countries around the world. Its apparent that the U.S. feels the need to do this because of national securirty, but also I believe we have a certain arrogance among the rest of the world. We as Americans believe we know what is best for the rest of society. I would argue that we are certainly considered a neo-colonial power.
ReplyDeleteI believe it is safe to say that the US is a neocolonial power considering all of the military bases that we have in other countries. The bases may not take direct action in some countries but just having them there has some kind of influence on those countries. I can understand that some foreigners dislike having our military bases in their countries. We wouldn't want them to have bases in our country. We should consider the reasons that foreigners don't want our bases there and match that against our reasoning for having the base there. I believe we should have military bases throughout the world but not as many as we have now.
ReplyDeleteI agree that the US is a neocolonial power. Even when the countries don't necessarily need the bases there, they're still there. There are too many bases I think. We need them I agree, but not quite as many. I can understand why some countries are upset about the bases. The US wouldn't want any other country to have base in its territory so why do we? Foreigners probably want to just be left alone, and to do and handle their issues themselves. The US doesn't have to be everywhere.
ReplyDeleteI can definitely understand how people from other countries would be upset and leary about having American's in their land, telling them what to do. I di believe that we can help them in keeping their country and livelihood safe, yes but I do not believe Americans are there for solely that reason. I believe American's have set up so many different bases so we can keep an eye on these other countries who pose a threat to us. After Pearl Harbor and 9/11 our country does not trust others, for good measure. I do not know if I'd call us neocolonialists but I would say that we are watching our backsides. Instead if having so many bases why not just send in operatives willing to sit behind the scenes, or even have their identities known, but have them send info back to us. If we minimized our base numbers then other countries wouldn't be so unhappy with us and it would give us more money to spend on other things. Domestic problems and the like.
ReplyDeleteThe U.S., in my opinion, is an neocolonial power. I understand why foreigners wouldn't approve of the bases because it probably looks like we're trying to take them over and I would imagine that it's probably a scary thing to them. The locals shouldn't be concerned about the bases but I understand why they feel the way they do about it. I know that I would have a problem with it if another counrty came in and set up.
ReplyDelete-Rebecca Harrelson
Along with everyone else that has posted on this topic, I believe the US is most certainly a neocolonial power. My main reasoning is because there are very few, if any, places that aren’t somewhat controlled by the United States. We have influences all over the world and there aren’t many places that would stand up to us. I also think that it is very important for the US to critically evaluate where and when we put our military bases around the world. If we put them somewhere we are not welcomed, it could potentially be a huge problem. If we are not putting them in places that could really use them, were losing people that depend on us and need our help.
ReplyDeleteI believe that it is a fair assessment to consider the United States a neocolonialist country. Since the formation of the US as a country it has strived and accomplished expansion of its borders. This, some say, can be seen today in the installment of US military bases all throughout the world. It is very easy to see how citizens of other countries see these bases in a negative light. It may seem like an invasion of their own national security or sovereignty having a US military instillation within their country’s borders. I think that the United States should be concerned with what people of other nations where we have bases at think about the bases on their lands. Most of the countries are democratic and what the people want eventually gets to the top level of their government. But as long as the bases are protecting the security of the US I feel it is, and will be necessary for those bases to exist in other countries and be fully operational to any and all extents required to protect the United States of America.
ReplyDeleteChad Starner
The United States is absolutely a neocolonial power, as many before me have said. It's hard to deny when one looks at all of the bases everywhere. The US has some sort of control on many, many countries. Bases are necessary to maintain national security, I agree and believe that. But I think that there are too many bases out there in other countries. I can certainly understand the concerns of citizens of those countries. I'm sure I would feel the exact same way if I was in their shoes.
ReplyDeleteKacy Cooper
Like many of the people above me I definately believe that the United State is Neocolonial power.We have many military bases in many different countries. I do fell though that is necessary to have these bases.They are there to protect our national security.Though I do understand why foreigner countries would have an issue with this.We as a country would not want other countries to come in and set up military bases here,so maybe it is not really necessary to have so many bases in so many countries.
ReplyDeleteBlair Jewell
Many people dislike the United States because they see us as selfish and pompous. We very often try to impose our ideas on other countries (such as what we're doing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now). We say we're helping these countries, but are we really? I see us in a similar role as "The Protector" in Rabbit-Proof Fence. While we think we're helping, we are most likely just imposing our own ideas because we think we are better and wiser than the other nation.
ReplyDeleteLaura Baker
Here are some reasons that explain why the west was described as Neo-colonial. The first is the European colonial powers could not maintain their territories after WWII. These countries needed substitute means to maintain their control over the former satellites. This method of colonialism was replaced by a different one. Second, the name was used extensively by the communist obfuscators to signify any capitalist country advancing in the economies of the unfledged countries. Therefore, this group of political opinion included the leaders of the Western group, the USA, as a neo-colonist power, although the USA had no colonies in the sense that its European allies had and despite, the fact that the current USA was native of territories that were under European rule, mostly British.
ReplyDeleteThe USA is the leader of the Western countries. Neo-colonial is the term used by the communist parties and gradually even the nationalist and non-communist parties began using it to define the western domination through means of exercising power. It has also been describe as a new form of imperialism.
We are far from imperialism though. Yes, we have made mistakes in foreign and domestic relations in a greater portion of the late 19th century and most of the 20th century but with every mistake we have made even greater progress that increases the ratio to favor the good of our country and its foreign relation and practices. I know that we have seen and read articles during this semester of class but they are still one part of a greater puzzle. We need good foreign relations with other countries. Not just for economical, but a global protection from factions that will commit harm on us and our allies.
It is not easy as pie or cut and dry in the learning’s and dealings in politics but before you start calling names or feeling this country is wrong, learn more from different sides of the coins or enlist and see the world for yourself because as my shipmates are still in the service, you are insulting them as well when talking negative about the USA.
In definition, Neocolonialism is said in the dictionary as the policy of a strong nation in seeking political and economic hegemony over an independent nation or extended geographical area without necessarily reducing the subordinate nation or area to the legal status of a colony. I believe this definition very closely defines the US. We often tamper with other countries' affairs that do not concern us, and for this reason, those countries have a certain vision of the US. They see us as controlling and prying country.
ReplyDeleteI believe the US should take local views and concerns seriously and with caution where our bases are throughout the world. I am not saying that this strategy or policy is a bad thing, but I do believe that we should be more courteous and cautious of the local people and governments we are interfering with.
In my opinion i definitely think that the United States is a nepcolonial power. The United States is definitely a major power that uses economic and political means to perpetuate or extend its influence over underdeveloped nations or areas. I can definitely see how foreigners would dislike US military instillations. In a way you could see the United States bases as being more of a benefit to the locals and their national security because it provides them with more protection apart from their own military forces. I think it is always important to know how the local people feel about the presence of our United States instillations in their country. It allows us to gain feedback from foreign contries. Our national security is definitely very important, however, I do not think that that means that we should completely ignore the locals and their feelings and thoughts of our bases being in their country.
ReplyDeleteYou do not get to the top without stepping on few peoples toes, and you do not stay at the top to continue to do so. Neocolonial is strong title. A super power and world police is a much better way to say it. We do not go for man power looking to enslave people, we do need natural resources in order to maintain our own and the worlds lifestyle. Most important it all ties into the word security, we need the bases to maintain order. I dont care what any anti war person says but no one wants to have a bomb on their door step on their way to work. This is what is required in order to maintain order! Order by the definition we have created.
ReplyDeleteThe united states is a Neocolonial power. No question about it. Over 1000 bases over seas?! that number alone says a message. We also preach spreading democracy and "freedom".yes, the US is a colonial power.however, the main issue is about own interests over seas, having 1000 plus bases for sure demonstrates strong interest in foreign issues. What those are exactly I do not know. I can see why some people dislike the US foreign policy. We continue to put military force over seas that is going to continue. I'm sure lost of the "interests" are legitimate. However, I think we need to cut down activity over seas in certain areas. We seem to be upsetting some folks.
ReplyDeleteNeocolonialism? I don't know. I know so little about all this. I have to admit it seems a little fishy though. I did see that Kwame Nkrumah died in 1972, so I wonder if things have changed since his accusation. Would he still be saying this if he were alive today?
ReplyDeleteDo the governments of the hosting countries no longer want us there or is it just a small portion of the population? I mean, you can't please everyone always, right? Did they not want us there in the first place? Do we just have a base there or are we exerting some sort of control over the country?
I can totally understand the anger when our soldiers rape their children, as in the Okinawa incident. And it seems to me that if we are going to exert control over another territory, such as Puerto Rico, then they should at least be given the opportunity to become an official, represented state. If we have established bases in a country against that country's will, then I think that we should reconsider staying there. To me that doesn't seem very American; we're supposed to be all about people's rights, right? Dropping radioactive shells on Vieques seems a bit inconsiderate.
I'm a big believer in the Golden Rule, and I see no reason why it can't apply to these situations as well. You gotta give respect to get respect. The application of power in the form of force or fear may get you want you want in the short term, but it will come back to bite ya.
Also, I don't see how disagreeing with our government's policies is an insult to soldiers. I think it would be more insulting to our soldiers if we were to not say anything and simply allow our government to do anything and everything they wanted with them. Then again, we do our fair share of that as well.
I do not think that we are a Neocolonial nation yet, but it does sound like we are getting there. I feel like we have taken our title as "World Leader" a little to far and now we are trying to police other nations into a democracy and try to keep them under "control". However if this keeps up and bases continue to pop up and we begin to force people to believe in our ways, by making an example of those who do not wish to participate, then yes we will turn into a Neocolonial nation.
ReplyDeleteDavid Leonard
I believe that the US is seen as a neocolonial power. With over 1000 bases overseas, in countries that are NOT US territory that especially makes it so. I could defintely see why foreigners would not like US military installations in their countries. I just recently became aware of the bomb testing in Puerto Rico. I unserstand the Puerto rico is US territory but the other miltary installations around the world aren't necessarily ours. Although, those do offer extra security in said countries. I don't think that these arguments are bogus. i think these military installations are for extra security but I believe the US is also showing how powerful they are. the US should be concerned with what locals think about the military installations, however the Us miltary won't do anyting about it. National Seciurity is very important to the US, however, the US should put consideration into where the put their military bases and where they test bombs.
ReplyDeleteThe United States tries to establish strong military power over the whole world. We attempt to do this by creating over a thousand military bases worldwide. We try to build a strategic military that can overcome any obstacle that crosses our path. In doing so, we generally have to make some people unhappy. There is no right way of doing something. I think the Military generally tries to make things as painless as possible but sometimes there is just no way around it. If the military did not make such drastic changes to try to improve, then people would be just as unhappy, maybe even more so, because the military is not trying to make a difference.
ReplyDeleteCatherine Pevahouse 100.03
I do believe the U.S. is a neocolonial power, if you have over a thousand bases spread out all over the world. Whether or not it bothers foreigners that U.S. government is walking around on their land I think it depends on who you ask, some people may like it. They may feel safe having a soldier around, some people may really hate it, policing themselves and feeling like they are in danger. I dont know how it would be, thats kind of hard for us as Americans to say, its not like the Russian government is set up beside Tony's in Shepherdstown. I think above all else this is another case in point of the U.S. states throwing its weight around policing the world, I know we've discussed whether or not its the U.S. job to do so, but sometimes its better to be safe than sorry.
ReplyDeleteTim Zeigler
As many people have said before me the United States is a Neocolonial power. I believe the US military installations are not just for national security. One example of this might be the natural resources that the US is obtaining by maintaining these bases. I can see no reason why foreigners would like US military installations in their country when they have no say in the matter. I think the locals concerns are very important factors to consider when operating the bases. Even though the military bases might be there for protection, how can they feel safe if they can't even trust us.
ReplyDeleteThe United States is considered a neocolonial power. The US has been trying to extend our culture around the world for many years, and will continue to in the future. The United States has colonized and claimed many places around the world as being our territories such as Puerto Rico and the US Virgin Islands. With the US having so many military bases all around the world is a great way to counter most attacks against us. Most other countries hate the fact that the US has placed military bases in their countries but there are also many countries that like the idea of more protection.
ReplyDeleteWilliam Sawyers
It's a violation of privacy and of ones home to place another countries base there, but in our perspective it is for our safety and quick involvement in case of an outbreak of war. We also do anything that will benefit us first and foremost. We also should be more concerned with other people's feelings but since it benefits us and it will not happen to us, why should we care that much? We are more concerned about controlling others than with their feelings and concerns about the invasion.
ReplyDeleteI do believe that the US is considered to have neocolonial power. I also believe that some foreigner countries might like the US being in their homelands because it makes them feel safer from out side attacks. If I lived in another country, I think it would be hard to see US troop waking around my town. But on the other hand I know that my town was problemly more safe with the bases their. With the Us bases there I think it will be not to the enemies benefit to attack. The counrty has outside help from the US.
ReplyDeleteI do believe that America is a neocolonial power. How different countries feel about this is a different story. I do feel that some countries appreciate our presence in theirs. It gives them a sense of security and protection within their borders. Other countries on the other hand, view the occupation as invasive and a nuisance. Countries who view themselves as independent powers most likely are not going to welcome us in their country. They don't want America telling them how to run their country and for the most part want to be left alone. These are the countries that would see us as invasive. Other countries that are vulnerable to attacks welcome us because they know we have the power to defend them and keep them safe. So i believe that yes America is a neocolonial power but the reception we receive is based on the current status of the country being occupied.
ReplyDeleteI believe that I could understand how someone in another country would not enjoy an invasion by another country in order to give us a "better life". In some cases, it may improve my life, sure, but to forced assimilation is not the best method.
ReplyDeleteThere isn't only one right way to live, people who want to assimilate can but to force every single person do it, like in the movie, doesn't work out. People want to live life the way they are most comfortable.
I believe undoubtedly the US is a neocolonial country. To have close to a thousand military bases worldwide is a sure sign of one trying to dominate and influence another country. Another great indication is the torture we enforce upon those who disagree or do not follow "our" way of life, or perform (or not) actions we do not like. Off the top, an example I can think of is waterboarding.....
ReplyDelete-Melani Lewis; Section 05
I think our country needs a neocolonial government. We have bases all over the world and it seems to be working. We could even get more bases if we really need them. Its just a good way to keep us and our country safe and there isnt anything wrong with that as long as we dont take it out of hand.
ReplyDeleteI feel our US government is a neocolonial power, but they try to make sure they are not portrayed as such. Such as saying that they are doing more good than harm in the countries they are currently occupying with military bases. Which very well could be the case, but I think the US needs to watch and take note of the attitude of the locals. Though in some cases, even if the locals are against US military presence, that military base should stay anyways for the protection of the country occupied. Also in some cases, the locals may prefer the military presence for the sake of protection. I think that the locals thoughts should be taken in account while deciding on the fates of the military bases.
ReplyDeleteJessica Lisk - PSCI-100:05:
I believe that the United States is a neocolonial country. Just the amount of bases we have over seas tells you that right there. I do not believe that we need that many bases all over the world. But what i believe and what's going on are two different things. We have these thousand of military bases world wide to show our dominance on other countries. But if i was an outsider looking in from another country, i would feel safe knowing that there is all this military power keeping me safe.
ReplyDeleteNicole Doxsee
05
I believe U.S. certainly is a neo-colonial power. U.S. has a lot of influence in a lot of countries. I cannot believe we are hitting the thousand mark in oversea bases. That is unbelievable. I think it could be a benefit but also a disadvanage. If something was going to happen in country X, our military will be there ready to help, but the true is whose country would like another foreign country to station there and remain there since world war II. People are not going to like foreign military take part of their land and 'experiment' with variety of weapons and such. I can see why they are upset because we certainly don't want a foreign base in U.S.
ReplyDeleteI believe that the US is seen as a neocolonial power. The number of military bases in different countries is so very large, making the US very influential and they have a lot of power in many different countries. For our country, many of the people see these bases as a good thing. But if we put ourselves in other countries shoes, I can see where they would grow upset at our bases. I personally would feel threatened or violated if another country set up a base near my home and performed strange acts that would not be familiar to me.
ReplyDeleteI believe that the USA is definetly neo-colonial. I can't believe that we have so many bases in other countries. I can see why people in other countries would feel that we shouldn't be in their country. The USA never would allow another country to set up bases in the US. We would revolt against them and kick them out.
ReplyDeleteI can most definitely see how other countries would dislike having our military in their country. Personally, I would feel unsafe because I wouldn’t want other people involved in our security and would not want to leave my security in some other country’s hands. It would also be unfair to say we are only in other countries to protect them because in fact we are there for some of our own advantages. Yes I do believe the US should be concerned with what locals think because if we could have a mutual understanding and agreements that benefit everyone, there will be no need for worry. And no, I do not feel our security is more important that locals concerns, although their opinions should not get in the way of keeping our country safe.
ReplyDeleteI think that the US is absolutely a neocolonial power. With the military bases that the US has all over the world, the US has a great deal of influences in these places. Although, I do see it as rather unfair that we do have these bases all over the world, but I do not think that we as a nation would accept a foreign nation to have one of their bases on our land. On the other hand, the bases that the US has all over the world also provide some security to nations that otherwise would not have this luxury. It is selfish for the US to set our national security priorities above the priorities of the local people around the bases that we have set around the world. In addition, if both of the priorities are met for both the US and the local people, I obviously see it as a win-win situation and something to strive for in the areas in and around all of the US bases worldwide.
ReplyDelete