Sunday, October 9, 2011

Libertarian Politics in America




This week we make a radical shift away from totalitarian governments to libertarian governments. These two ways of governing populations sit at opposite ends of the spectrum: 1) totalitarian systems work to dissolve individuals into the larger collective of the state and 2) libertarian systems celebrate individuals and their inherent rights -- these civil rights limit the state's ability to interfere in the lives of the individuals it governs.
Here are some of the Libertarian Party's positions on various social and political issues of our time. Read through them and respond to the questions I've asked at the end of the blog post.

1.0 Personal Liberty

Individuals should be free to make choices for themselves and to accept responsibility for the consequences of the choices they make. No individual, group, or government may initiate force against any other individual, group, or government. Our support of an individual's right to make choices in life does not mean that we necessarily approve or disapprove of those choices.

1.1 Expression and Communication

We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

1.2 Personal Privacy

Libertarians support the rights recognized by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, and property. Protection from unreasonable search and seizure should include records held by third parties, such as email, medical, and library records. Only actions that infringe on the rights of others can properly be termed crimes. We favor the repeal of all laws creating “crimes” without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes.

1.3 Personal Relationships

Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government's treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption,immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.

1.4 Abortion

Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.

1.5 Crime and Justice

Government exists to protect the rights of every individual including life, liberty and property. Criminal laws should be limited to violation of the rights of others through force or fraud, or deliberate actions that place others involuntarily at significant risk of harm. Individuals retain the right to voluntarily assume risk of harm to themselves. We support restitution of the victim to the fullest degree possible at the expense of the criminal or the negligent wrongdoer. We oppose reduction of constitutional safeguards of the rights of the criminally accused. The rights of due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty, must not be denied. We assert the common-law right of juries to judge not only the facts but also the justice of the law.

1.6 Self-Defense

The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense.
We oppose all laws at any level of government requiring registration of, or restricting, the ownership, manufacture, or transfer or sale of firearms or ammunition.

2.0 Economic Liberty

Libertarians want all members of society to have abundant opportunities to achieve economic success. A free and competitive market allocates resources in the most efficient manner. Each person has the right to offer goods and services to others on the free market. The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute
wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society.


2.1 Property and Contract

Property rights are entitled to the same protection as all other human rights. The owners of property have the full right to control, use, dispose of, or in any manner enjoy, their property without interference, until and unless the exercise of their control infringes the valid rights of others. We oppose all controls on wages, prices, rents, profits, production, and interest rates. We advocate the repeal of all laws banning or restricting the advertising of prices, products, or services. We oppose all violations of the right to private property, liberty of contract, and freedom of trade. The right to trade includes the right not to trade — for any reasons whatsoever. Where property, including land, has been taken from its rightful owners by the government or private action in violation of individual rights, we favor restitution to the rightful owners.


2.2 Environment

We support a clean and healthy environment and sensible use of our natural resources. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Pollution and misuse of resources cause damage to our ecosystem. Governments, unlike private businesses, are unaccountable for such damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights in resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. We realize that our planet's climate is constantly changing, but environmental advocates and social pressure are the most effective means of changing public behavior.

2.3 Energy and Resources

While energy is needed to fuel a modern society, government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. We oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation, and production.

2.4 Government Finance and Spending

All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes.

2.5 Money and Financial Markets

We favor free-market banking, with unrestricted competition among banks and depository institutions of all types. Individuals engaged in voluntary exchange should be free to use as money any mutually agreeable commodity or item. We support a halt to inflationary monetary policies and unconstitutional legal tender laws.


2.6 Monopolies and Corporations

We defend the right of individuals to form corporations, cooperatives and other types of companies based on voluntary association. We seek to divest government of all functions that can be provided by non-governmental organizations or private individuals. We oppose government subsidies to business, labor, or any other special interest. Industries should be governed by free markets.

2.7 Labor Markets

We support repeal of all laws which impede the ability of any person to find employment. We oppose government-fostered forced retirement. We support the right of free persons to associate or not associate in labor unions, and an employer should have the right to recognize or refuse to recognize a union. We oppose government interference in bargaining, such as compulsory arbitration or imposing an obligation to bargain.

2.8 Education

Education, like any other service, is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Schools should be managed locally to achieve greater accountability and parental involvement. Recognizing that the education of children is inextricably linked to moral values, we would return authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. In particular, parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children's education.


2.9 Health Care

We favor restoring and reviving a free market health care system. We recognize the freedom of individuals to determine the level of health insurance they want, the level of health care they want, the care providers they want, the medicines and treatments they will use and all other aspects of their medical care, including end-of-life decisions. People should be free to purchase health
insurance across state lines.


2.10 Retirement and Income Security

Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Libertarians would phase out the current government-sponsored Social Security system and transition to a private voluntary system. The proper and most effective source of help for the poor is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals. We believe members of society will become more charitable and civil society will be strengthened as government reduces its activity in this realm.

3.0 Securing Liberty

The protection of individual rights is the only proper purpose of government. Government is constitutionally limited so as to prevent the infringement of individual rights by the government itself. The principle of non-initiation of force should guide the relationships between governments.

3.1 National Defense

We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. We oppose any form of compulsory national service.

3.2 Internal Security and Individual Rights

The defense of the country requires that we have adequate intelligence to detect and to counter threats to domestic security. This requirement must not take priority over maintaining the civil liberties of our citizens. The Constitution and Bill of Rights shall not be suspended even during time of war. Intelligence agencies that legitimately seek to preserve the security of the nation must be subject to oversight and transparency. We oppose the government's use of secret classifications to keep from the public information that it should have, especially that which shows that the government has violated the law.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by
political or revolutionary groups.

3.4 Free Trade and Migration

We support the removal of governmental impediments to free trade. Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders. However, we support control over the entry into our country of foreign nationals who pose a credible threat to security, health or property.


3.5 Rights and Discrimination

We condemn bigotry as irrational and repugnant. Government should not deny or abridge any individual's rights based on sex, wealth, race, color, creed, age, national origin, personal habits, political preference or sexual orientation. Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs.

3.6 Representative Government

We support electoral systems that are more representative of the electorate at the federal, state and local levels. As private voluntary groups, political parties should be allowed to establish their own rules for nomination procedures, primaries and conventions. We call for an end to any tax-financed subsidies to candidates or parties and the repeal of all laws which restrict voluntary financing of election campaigns. We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny the voters their right to consider all legitimate alternatives.


3.7 Self-Determination

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of individual liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to agree to such new governance as to them shall seem most likely to protect their liberty.


Take a moment, reflect on, and respond to the questions below:

Which one (or more than one) of these Libertarian positions do you find unacceptable? Why do you find it unacceptable? Or, do you agree with all of them? What about these Libertarian positions do you find agreeable? Why do you like them?

How would a libertarian respond to the assassination of an American citizen by the US President?

56 comments:

  1. I find that I do not agree with many of these polocies. Some of the ones I am most apposed to are Expression and Communication, Personal Relationships, Abortion, and Health Care. The government needs more power when it comes to such radical ideas of freedom. It sickens me to think that all these immoral things could be allowed by the government. I do agree with Self-Defense and Retirement and Income Security. Those are the only two that I would support fromthis list. I think everyone should be able to have a weapon and people are responsible for planning for the future. A libertarian would be against the killing of an American citizen because that citizen was doing whatever he wanted. I do not agree with this libertarian view.
    Corbin Clark
    PSCI 100.3
    MWF 11-12

    ReplyDelete
  2. I do not believe a libertarian would agree with the assassination of Alwaki. However, I do not feel our country is anywhere near having a libertarian government. Our country is struggling with much of the policies on the list and I believe that most if not all would strike up some type of conflict.

    Kaila Burch
    PSCI 100.04
    T-TH 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  3. A libertarian probably would not agree with the recent assassination of a U.S. citizen but I agree with Kaila. Our country is far from being libertarian. In my opinion, the policies listed are always ideal but never accepted or approved.

    Dylan Nick
    100.04
    T-TH 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  4. I personally agree with all of the libertarian positions. Truly it does seem that the "preservation of rights" is very important and the free market as well. A few that I defiantly would stand by would be Rights and Discrimination, Energy and Resources, Retirement Income Security, and National Security. The reason I would say these are the most acceptable would be that each individual is different whether it be color, ethics, orientation, etc… This should have no effect on someone since personal decisions or race can neither be controlled or enforced. Also with the energy and resources; there are many ways that usable energy can be obtained other than oil. Oil companies monopolize and control every market because the "government" is to naive to find an alternative source such as solar power or hydroelectric power. (Not meaning flooding a 10,000 acre stretch of rainforest displacing thousands of species of animals and plants for power but finding a manageable source that won't impact the environment negatively.) As for retirement and income security, yes it is a good thing to help our fellow americans that have helped fuel our economy to aid in their well-being. However, with the age of death becoming longer and longer by the time I'm 70 I won't have that money because the baby boomers are going to use it all. I also strongly agree that we are not the policemen of the world. If it threatens our citizens then yes but standing between a Jew and a Palestinian is not going to do anything they have been fighting for thousands of years about a book that is just written in the same dialect just a different language and different names, (they are totally the same story for the most part). Lets worry about our economy crashing and the betterment of our whole country before we enter senseless battles. A libertarian would definitely not agree with assassinating a U.S. citizen since the rights of the individual are so strong and prevalent.

    Jimmy Hanback
    PSCI 100.04
    T-TH 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  5. I personally disagree with a lot of the Liberitarian Positions. I do not think that a Liberitarian society would do well here in the United States. I agree with the policies about education and also about their not being discrimination. A lot of the policies above are uncalled for. Such as the personal privacy and communication. For the government to go through our private business to me is necessary only when something is suspected from someone, they do not have the right to go through someones private business if the person did nothing that was against the law. I agree with Jimmy, we need to worry more about the poor and crashing economy than worry about a Liberitarian government. And I also agree that a liberitarian would not agree with assassination od a U.S citizen like those have commented.
    Tiffany Didawick
    PSCI 100.04
    T-TH 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  6. One of the policies that I dont agree with is self determinaton, I believe that in order to have a successful well run government we need to have some rules and regulation, with self-determination you are allowing the individual the right to abolish or change any governments rule, I feel as if that would create mass caos whenever someone had a complaint about the littlest thing. I do however agree with the rule of abortion, however it may be wrong and I would never do, I believe in pro-choice. If you are unable to provide or if you are raped you should choose for the betterment of yourself. Last week’s assassination of two American citizens, Anwar al-Awlaki and Samir Khan, was an outrage and a criminal act carried out by the President and his administration. The Liberitartians would look at this as wrong.

    Jenna Hoffman
    MWF 11:10-12
    psci 100

    ReplyDelete
  7. I do believe most of the ideas of a libertarian. It seems a lot more flexible and giving than that of the government we have now. I think that being a libertarian allows for more freedom of everything, as in more freedom than we supposedly have now. Libertarians would look at the assasination of Awlaki in disgrace.

    Ashley Bryant
    psci T-TH

    ReplyDelete
  8. I found most if not all of the libertarian points appealing, it really is for the individual. it keeps personal matters personal instead of having the state decide what is best for you. i feel libertarians would not take kindly to the assassination of an American citizen, for it violates many of their key points.
    -Katlyn Kettering
    PSCI 100.03
    M.W.F 11-12

    ReplyDelete
  9. I disagree with a lot of the libertarian points that you have listed up above, to name a few of them are crime and justice, property and contract, monopolies and corporations, and self discrimination. I do not believe that a libertarian would agree with the killing of a US Citizen. I also agree with Kaila when she said our country is no where near becoming libertarian. I also agree with Tiffany, we need to focus on more important things then on a libertarian government. For example the poor. we could help them out more.

    Katie Reeg
    PSCI 100.04
    T-TR 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  10. I believe that we're already down the path of libertarian government. People have been taking more and more interest in personal rights, such as personal liberty, expression and communication, personal privacy, personal relationships, abortion, etc. Some states have even been passing laws to allow things such as gay marriages. To me, what libertarians believe is all very interesting and I'd like to see how things would go if we had that type of government. I believe it could go very well and make a complete turn-around with our government, or be really bad and cause more harm than good. But that's normally the risk in anything different.

    Kourtney Weld
    PSCI 100.3
    MWF 11-12

    ReplyDelete
  11. I agree with the Libertarian ways. I think that the United States has become so safe to the point that we are starting to lose what we called "privacy". Everything is recored, monitored, and watched which totally takes away from our rights. However, if I had to disagree with any of these, it would be about retirement. I think the way the government handles our retirement now is efficient. People don't have the type of money to save like they used too. Most people live paycheck to paycheck so saving is close to impossible. I agree with the rights about discrimination. I think we as a country have become more acceptable with race, gender, ethnicity, gays, bisexuals and everything else. Its great that people dont have to be embarassed about who they really are. I like that they support a clean environment. The more respect we have for the environment, the better off everyone is. I do not think the Libertarian government would agree with the killing of the american citizen. I believe this because to me, it seems like they harp on the persons own freedom. That means not looking through everything they do, and not judging them by the way they look.

    Stephanie Shank
    PSCI 100.04
    Tues/thurs
    12:25-1:40pm

    ReplyDelete
  12. In response to Corbin’s comment, I totally disagree with you, Personal Relationships, Abortion, Expression and communication and Health Care are the places where the government needs to keep their nose out of! If a thirteen year old girl is raped and is nowhere near ready to raise a child why shouldn’t she be able to get an abortion, someone else may have just ruined her life for her, not to mention the rumors that will be spread about her. I’m not saying I’m for abortion, but I believe that you should have to choice. And who cares if you want to marry someone of the same gender, or homosexual couples wants to adopt, in some situations they may be able to provide that child with a better life than the normal “Mother-Father” parents. And as far as health care goes, I’m a fairly healthy person so I shouldn’t be forced to have a certain amount of health insurance; where as someone else may chose to have more. On the other hand, would you really feel safe with a bunch of crazy people walking around with guns? I know I probably wouldn’t. I know there have been plenty of times people have really pissed me off and I would have probably done something stupid had I been carrying a weapon. I also know that I have pissed other people off too that probably wanted to do something stupid towards me…scary thought huh?!
    Ashley Wright
    Psci 100.3
    MWF 11-12

    ReplyDelete
  13. After reading this I believe I am a Libertarian. I agree with nearly everything I read. The government should but out of our life’s sometimes. We are living in a free country and with that we should make our own personal choices. The only things that make me think was the government not being allowed to set prices and regulate trade. This could be scary because if bread companies decide to sell a loaf for 5.00 could be possible. Although it seems they are already robbing us with gas prices. Also people are responsible for their own retirement. This is kind of sketchy to me because it seems like most people wouldn’t then we would have this huge population of elderly with no money and no way of care. We already have this somewhat but without Medicare this could be a horrible situation. With some adjustments I would vote for a libertarian.
    Jessica Bailey
    psci 100.4
    T/TR 1225-140

    ReplyDelete
  14. I agree with several of these, however not all of them. I believe that we should have police and survelliance to a certain extent more than that of a libertarian.
    Companies need to have regulation in competition or it could cause inflation.
    I think we should have to pay some taxes or else who pays for our defense, etc?
    I most certainly agree with being able to bear arms, free speech, etc.

    I don't think a Libertarian govt. would be okay with the killing of an American citizen.

    Rose Walker
    PSCI T Th 12:25

    ReplyDelete
  15. No true Libertarian or Libertarian government would be okay or in any way condone the killing of an American citizen. I was slightly offended when some people said it was "okay" to kill the man because he 'wasn't born an American citizen' and 'wasn't living on American soil'. My cousin was born in Germany, became an American citizen when she was 24 and now lives in Berlin. I surely hope that doesn't mean its okay to assasinate here with absolutely no solid evidence from the government. I like that American citizens would like to believe that we are on our way to a Libertarian government but even if Ron Paul did win election, we are years and lots of work away from ever be able to call our country a Libertarian ruled society.

    Danielle Smith
    PSCI T Th 12:25

    ReplyDelete
  16. I agree with most of these ideas. Obviously the government needs some power and collective action to protect ourselves. Total libertarianism is a little too extreme for me, but I believe we would be better off with more libertarian policies than socialistic policies.

    Ted McDonald
    PSCI 100.3 MWF 11-12

    ReplyDelete
  17. I agree with a lot of the libertarian views, and I have to admit some of them would be nice to have...they're very appealing. Now I don't agree with all of them like the Self determination, as someone else said before me we need to have some sort of solid laws, if everyone was able to change or get rid of government that easily it would create total chaos because I believe it would be an ever changing thing. Not everyone would ever be satisfied. I definitely don't think libertarians would approve of the assassination of a US citizen..or almost anyone without reason or evidence.

    Brianne Fisher
    TR 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  18. I don’t really agree too much with the issue 2.3, energy and resources. I agree that the government should not subsidize oil companies that make millions of dollars a year, but I don’t agree that they should have no control over the pricing of energy. Suppose the government gave up this control, what would keep the oil companies from charging thousands of dollars for a barrel of oil, or who would regulate how much electric companies charge per kilowatt hour? I don’t agree with this issue due to possible price gouging, not that is doesn’t happen now. I suppose that issue 2.8 and 2.9 fall into this as well. I agree with issue 3.3, International affairs. I have often wondered why the US seems to always stick their noses where it does not belong. I have also wondered why we can send aid to foreign countries when we have people in this country that go to bed hungry every night. I understand that our resources are more abundant than those of other countries, but I think that we should take care of our own before we concern ourselves with others. There are actually several positions that I agree with. I worry about the fact that everyone having the right to bear arms. There are a lot of crazy people in this country and the fact that these people would be armed in such a society is frightening. I realize that everyone is armed; therefore you can protect yourself, assuming you get to the trigger first. Under a Libertarian government, the rights of the individual are of most importance. As part of position 1.5, it states that the innocence until proven guilty must not be denied. The assassination of an American citizen by the orders given by the President violates what Libertarians believe.
    Patricia Claude
    PSCI 100-03

    ReplyDelete
  19. I find myself agreeing with some of these. I really agree with the abortion and the personal relationships laws. when it comes to abortion, although i'm opposed to it, it should be the woman's decision to give up the baby in that way or not. for the personal relationships part, i fully agree. it shouldn't matter if you are gay or straight. you should be able to marry whoever you want to without being frowned upon for youe choices. I'm strongly for this one seeing as i'm bi and i feel that i should be able to have a choice to marry a guy or a girl. if i chose a girl i wouldnt want to deal with the judgement. i get that enough from people i don't know. people judge so quickly these days that my family doesnt even know my sexual orientation. this is all just my opinion.

    Kayla Myers
    PSCI 100-03

    ReplyDelete
  20. I agree with the majority of the libertarian views. If we started following all the libertarian ways, I feel it would be a good thing. I know we do need government for protection, but we would be better off not being so over powered and controlled by the government.
    Taylor Frankenberry
    PSCI 100.03
    mwf 11-12

    ReplyDelete
  21. Reading through the policies I find some more agreeable than others while also being split on some of the issues. I strongly agree with the Rights and Discrimination policy along with the personal relationship issue. The government should not be aloud to decide who one should be allowed to marry while also not aloud to discriminate against race, sex, or ethnicity. I also liked the environment policy because the environment should be preserved and taken care of and it doesn't seem to be that big of a deal in the world today, and I think that most people tend to overlook it and think that the environment isn't that important. I disagree with the education and the health care policies. I feel like education should be offered the same throughout the country and every student deserves to get the best education possible, no matter how much money they have or what area of the country they are from. With the issue of Health Care, I am a strong supporter of universal health care and I think that the health care system in America is very poor because it denies so many Americans the help that they need because they can't afford it or are rejected by the insurance companies. I wouldn't mind paying the extra percentage of taxes if that means that we can keep the citizens in our country healthy and give them the health benefits that they deserve. One policy that I find myself split on is the self-defense policy. I agree that self defense and the right to bear arms is a good and necessary thing, but I believe the government should have some sort of regulation on gun control because if we just allowed everyone the right to carry a gun on them at all times, there would be people killing others left and right. It is important for citizens to feel safe with protection by a gun, but not all citizens are worthy of caring one and so a permit of some sort should be provided. From the policies listed above and from the given information, I believe that a libertarian would be outraged at the assassination of an American citizen by the US president because all of the rights were taken away. There was no evidence presented and the citizen did not get his constitutional rights to a fair trial or anything- which goes along with the 1.5 Crime and Justice Policy.

    Kari Still
    PSCI TR 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  22. For the most part I agree with these positions. I think they are reasonable and would improve many of the conditions we have now. I definitely think they would provide for more freedom. It also seems like Libertarians look out more for citizens and are more conscious of their wants and needs.

    Sara Paquet
    PSCI MWF 11:10-12:00

    ReplyDelete
  23. I do not think a libertarian would agree with the assassination of Alwaki.I feel Liberatiarian views are not completely realistic. Most sound great. Who wouldn't want these things, but you can't get all of them without sacrafising another. America is far from being Liberatarian in my opinion. There will never be a government that satisfies everybody.
    Amber Kollar
    PSCI: 101: 04
    MWF: 11:10-12:00

    ReplyDelete
  24. I agree with alot of libertarian veiws and there are also those I dont agree with. As far as Alwaki....it is definatly not something they would agree with. But in my veiws the President was right to kill him but no matter if he is an American citizen or not he deserved a fair trial, ir at least substantial proof that he was a known terrorist. Most people are saying on here that they dont think America is ready for a Leberal Govt. I dont think Amreica knows what it wants. Chad Watson PCSI 100:04

    ReplyDelete
  25. I think all of the policies listed for a libertarian government would be very beneficially to this country. I mean think about it all of the policies make sense. I'm. Sure like every type of political system there are things that aren't always perfect, but these policies listed sound very beneficially. A libertarian goverenment would not be ok with the government assinating someone in their community would be unacceptable because a liberal government is all about an individuals rights.

    Brian wilt
    TR 12:25-150

    ReplyDelete
  26. I'm on the fence about the policies of libertarianism. I agree with the individual rights being a huge priority, but not the main priority. I don't there should be just one major priority in a government. I think there needs to be a balance of individual rights, and national rights.

    Tessa Rakowski
    MWF 1110-1215
    PSCI 100

    ReplyDelete
  27. I do not think in any way would a libertarian would think greatly about the assassination of an American citizen by the U.S. president. I think the libertarian policies are interesting. They let people make their own choices and be individuals for the most part. I agree with every position shown above and think it would be intereting to see what the United tates would be like if this were the political system.

    Briana Simpson
    PSCI 100-04
    T/R 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  28. Well to respond to the assassination question, a libertarian would absolutely not accept it. They would to know exactly why the person was assassinated and would protest about the persons rights. As for the positions they stand for, I do not agree with the migration policy. I feel very strongly as to whom I think should be able to enter our country. We have become massly over populated and a large portion of that is due to immigrants, none the less illegal. I do not agree that all immigrants should be aloud to enter our country. I also do not agree with the Securing Liberty policy. The government is not only to protect our given rights, but also serve the economy and its citizens in other ways. For example, national security, taxes, and so forth. As a whole, I do seem to agree with most of the libertarian policies. I think that they are fair and look out for the American citizen. Their main view is to protect our rights as a citizen and I find that very important, especially since as time goes on, people forget more and more that these rights are ours, and can't just be taken away without a fight. But that's exactly what we are letting happen.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Well to respond to the assassination question, a libertarian would absolutely not accept it. They would to know exactly why the person was assassinated and would protest about the persons rights. As for the positions they stand for, I do not agree with the migration policy. I feel very strongly as to whom I think should be able to enter our country. We have become massly over populated and a large portion of that is due to immigrants, none the less illegal. I do not agree that all immigrants should be aloud to enter our country. I also do not agree with the Securing Liberty policy. The government is not only to protect our given rights, but also serve the economy and its citizens in other ways. For example, national security, taxes, and so forth. As a whole, I do seem to agree with most of the libertarian policies. I think that they are fair and look out for the American citizen. Their main view is to protect our rights as a citizen and I find that very important, especially since as time goes on, people forget more and more that these rights are ours, and can't just be taken away without a fight. But that's exactly what we are letting happen.

    Jessica VanFleet
    TR 12:25

    ReplyDelete
  30. To be completely libertarian and in full agreement with the above statements, I am not. However, having some freedom regarding our personal lives and the ways in which we live I do agree. But, if there was not a government passing laws and enforcing them, I feel our world could and would become in a "state of confusion" and out of control. I am all for our freedom, but unfortunately the actions of today are far more great than those actions of yesterday. Therefore, we do need some form of government to help maintain our safety and security, and above all, our well being.

    Megan Manuel
    PSCI 100.04 TR

    ReplyDelete
  31. I think that many of the policies are acceptable. For example, having the power to have any religious view without any interference. The right to have any sexual orientation and marry whomever you want. Still having the right to a trial is acceptable. I don't know if abolishing the IRS is a good idea. Taking away crimes without victims, where drug users are not criminals is not acceptable. I think that a libertarian would be be very disapproving of what Obama did. They just want equality and the least amount of government interference.
    .Amanda.Etube.
    ..PSCI.100.03..

    ReplyDelete
  32. I do agree with some of the positions but not all. I think that the positions on Government Finance & Spending, Retirement and Social Security, and Health Care are all good policies that could help our country out of we operated like this. Not allowing the government to go in debt is a major one that I agree with; if we were to follow this now our country may not be in the economic state that is in currently. Also allowing the individual to choose their retirement plans and do this on their own is a smart way to look at it. It would leave the individual responsible and would guarantee if they saved they would have some type of retirement money. I totally agree with the healthcare position, why should the government tell us what health insurance to have and what doctors to see; I think this should be left to the individual. The position I would have to disagree with is Self Determination, there always needs to be some type of determining law. If there were no government to make policies and enforce them, problems would arise. I think implementing some of these practices into our government would help our country tremendously. I think that a Libertarian would have taken a more cautious approach to the Alwaki situation.
    ~Sara Balog
    PSCI 100-04
    TR 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  33. I agree with most of the Libertarian party's positions. Their policies sound good on paper, but whether they'll actually work out for the good of the country is up in the air. I believe their policies open up more choices for individuals. They aren't throwing morals out the window like some people seem to believe, they leave it up to individuals to decide. One thing I am still unsure about is the ability of a Libertarian government to defend the nation against outside attacks. A Libertarian would be very concerned that one person in the government could wield enough power to unlawfully assassinate a U.S. citizen without repercussion.
    Michael Citro
    PSCI 100-03

    ReplyDelete
  34. For the most part I believe that these policies are well-thought, we could still achieve equality by having no discrimination and having every citizen have the right to their own property and self. But there are some policies listed above that I believe that are needed to be reconsidered.

    2.2 Environment, it might be true that the government has a bad track record in maintaining the environment but that holds true for any other company. Companies in most cases care more about efficiency, that can they could easily get a huge boost in profit by using unregulated materials and cost cutting health and safety. It's naive to think that these companies would adhere to the idea of protecting the environment while making profit

    2.4 Government Finance and Spending seems far-fetched, it would benefit the people but on the down side, no income tax would greatly reduce the government's budget even if i'm all for a lower percentage of income tax. having no income tax, I wonder how they will implement their policies for 3.1 National Defense which they expect to "support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression". since the libertarian approach is to reduce regulation in society and economy, It would create a more complicated diversity from place to place.

    As for the Assassination of Alwaki, if a person is indeed a true Libertarian then he/she would be disappointed of the said incident.

    ReplyDelete
  35. ^ for REU
    Leslie Uri Acuesta
    PSCI 100 mwf 11:10-12:00

    ReplyDelete
  36. I agree with the libertarian veiw of the environment. It shold be kept clean and people should watch what chemicals are being put into the environment.

    Kaitlyn Matthai
    PSCI 100.3
    MWF 11:10-12

    ReplyDelete
  37. I truthfully believe that our U.S. government shares if not all of these positions as a Libertarian. But I also beleive that the United States governement would should consider doing some of these things that are presented as well. There are some things that are done different but most of the traits are very similar. This is what would happen to someone who killed the President, taken from context above. We oppose reduction of constitutional safeguards of the rights of the criminally accused. The rights of due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty, must not be denied. We assert the common-law right of juries to judge not only the facts but also the justice of the law.

    Ryan Potts
    T-R 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  38. I like what I read above about libertarianism. I do feel thought two things we do need government intervention though. I feel that the government does need to do a bit of censorship because otherwise we would be open for an attack. You saw North Koreans towards the United States they hated us, and there are many more countries like that. Didn't say it was right, but needed.

    Another thing needed is government intervention in the market. We do NOT want a repeat of the great depression. And the government helps out to make sure it is some what steady, because lets face it, a lot of people are greedy.

    I do like that poster!! It is funny and I 100% agree with it! We as americans should have the right to keep personal items personal, like our car. But I do feel that communication censorship is necessary.

    Hope Fraser;
    T-R 12:25-1:40 pm

    ReplyDelete
  39. I am really on the fence with libertarian views. They sound like good policies, but it would be a difficult transition for America. I don't think that the majority of Americans would know how to responsibly handle that much freedom. It is a good concept, but I don't think that we, as a country, could handle it.

    Greg Matthews
    T Th 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  40. I don't find any of the positions unacceptable. I agree with them all. They allow for maximum freedom, while still having the government be able to take action when needed, like when someone (be it another person or another country) is doing something to hurt someone else.
    I do see some validity to the argument that people need to be protected from themselves but i think that would work itself out with time, people would learn to take care of themselves. And if they didn't.. well they wouldn't make it then.

    Alexandra Kezman
    PSI 100
    T TH 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  41. A libertarian would most likely not agree with the recent assassination of a U.S. citizen, however our country is far from being libertarian. I think some of the policies listed would be beneficial,but never are accepted nor approved.
    Amber Collis
    MWF 11:10-12:00

    ReplyDelete
  42. I disagree with the majority of liberal positions. One that stands out to me is Property and Contract. The way it is written in this article makes it seem one would have complete control over a piece of property. When it comes down to what the government wants, liberals believe government has the right to use eminent domain to accomplish a public end. In layman’s terms, government can seize property from an owner against their will. Government will compensate for the property but the price is usually below what the land is really worth. Not every case is the same and some purchases of private land by the government are necessary for the greater good.
    I do agree with Self-Defense, but the right of ownership to a firearm has always been a conservative’s view. Liberals have never liked the Second Amendment and have tried to pass laws making it harder to own firearms, such as the Brady Bill. Liberals believe the Second Amendment does not give citizens the right to keep and bear arms, but only allows for state to keep a militia. This position, since it is supposed to be liberal, is a somewhat confusing to me.
    A libertarian would highly disagree with the assassination of an American citizen by the US President. Liberals have always disagreed with the death penalty since they believe every execution risks killing an innocent person and that it is a cruel and unusual punishment.

    Megan Frazer
    MWF 11:10-12:00

    ReplyDelete
  43. The easiest I found to agree with was the Self- Determination article because I thought it to be the most relivent that we already have. For instance, it said that if someone doesn't like something they have the right to alter or abolish it. That is true as American citizens ar able to write letters to different politicans and those in leadership positions about laws. As far as going killing an American citizen, the liberitarians are against it.

    Kirsten Dorosh
    PSCI 100.03
    MWF 11:10-12

    ReplyDelete
  44. Some of these Libertarian policies do make sense if they are not taken to an extreme case. The policy about Personal Privacy is good because the the United States should respect the document that WE wrote way back in the beginning of our country. I do not believe in the National Defense system they believe in because each country needs an alliance not just because of military protection but also global trade for items that are needed such as food and technology that basically run our world. I wish these policies were to be enacted but it would be very difficult to actually get United States citizens to vote for the right person in office. All these policies though do have to have some rules or individual freedom might endanger other people.

    Troy McNeill
    PSCI 100.03
    MWF 11:10-12

    ReplyDelete
  45. There are only a few policies on this list that I find unacceptable. Probably the most obvious one to me is policy 2.8 Education. I feel that this policy would cheat out a lot of people who would like to further their education.

    PSCI 100.03

    ReplyDelete
  46. I strongly disagree with a lot of these policies especially the crime and justice policy because libertarians are saying that the only crimes are ones where it infringes on anothers rights. I feel that a lot of crimes now would not be crimes under libertarian. I think this system does not have enough government involovement.

    Steven Lesko
    PSCI 100-04 TR 12:25

    ReplyDelete
  47. I feel like some, even most of these policies are somewhat fair, yet they should have more restrictions. Such as abortion and personal relationships. I don't have a side for libertarians but some policies could be considered and some not.
    Dylan Nick
    T-R 12:25-1:40
    Poly Sci

    ReplyDelete
  48. I do not agree with many of the libritarian positions. THe few that i do agree with is the right to bear arms and protect the self and property. Also i agree with the free education and health care. I believe that if these policies are successful in other parts of the world it can be sucessfull here too. Many of the other policies I do not agree with becuase of my own personal morals and religon. I also do not believe that many of policies do not fallow what america was based on.

    Heather Burleson
    PCIS TUTR 12-1;45
    October 16, 10:46pm

    ReplyDelete
  49. I agree with many of these Libertarian positions such as 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, and 1.4. I especially agree with the personal relationship and abortion topics because I feel those decisions should definitely be made by the individual, not by the government. I feel that the assassination of an American citizen by the US President would not be acceptable in a libertarian society especially because libertarians believe that the rights of an individual are very important.
    Tracy Ocampo
    PSCI 100.03
    MWF 11:10-12

    ReplyDelete
  50. I actually agree with the majority of Libertarian positions on issues. I agree that the government at its current state has way too much power. I like that the views of Libertarians support individual decision making and I strongly believe the government has no business in our personal decisions. I do not think they would take lightly an assassination of the president in a Libertarian government because they are against using any force and violence as a whole.
    Garrett Hess
    PSCI 100:03
    MWF 11:10-12

    ReplyDelete
  51. Though I agree with some of the policies, I don't agree with all of them. I think abortion should have more restrictions. So some of these policies are good, but not all of them.
    Danny Kremen
    T-R 12:25-1:40
    Poly Sci 100:04

    ReplyDelete
  52. I agree with all of these. I think that if this were the way the country were run we'd all be in a much better place.

    Brendan Darby
    PSCI 100
    T TH

    ReplyDelete
  53. I find all of these positions agreeable. I believe that the government is in some ways holding us back, and we could do a lot better without it. I also believe, as a republican, the government should have as little to do with our everyday lives as possible. Position 1.4 says that although abortion is a touchy subject, government shouldn't be involved and, while I do not believe in abortions, I agree with that. It is not the governments place to tell us what we can and cannot do with our bodies.

    ReplyDelete
  54. I think that some of these issues (like being able to pick your sexual orientation, life partner, etc. without discrimination) are fair. However, when someone needs protected, say by the police or government (like in the assassination case we have been talking about), I think the people of the U.S. would really be missing their federal government and the role they play.

    Amanda Lundstrom
    polysci 100:04
    TR 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  55. I do agree with these, there isnt really anything that I didnt think was right. I think that we would do better as a country if this is the way things were run. This way gives us more freedom and more options on life. It makes us more individual and I think that is what we need, to be in more control of our lives. About the abortion and sexual orientation, I agree completely because its not the governments life, its ours. We should have the say in what we want to do. And I believe that a libertarian would not be okay with the assassination.

    Kyra Fox
    PSCI 100.04
    T.TH 12:25-1:40

    ReplyDelete
  56. I disagree with some of the libertarian views and agree with others. I feel the government should help with education and retirerment ut shouldn't have a say in who we can and can't marry.

    Dwight Shilling
    PSCI 100.03

    ReplyDelete