Monday, October 15, 2012

Libertarian Politics in America






This week we make a radical shift away from totalitarian governments to libertarian governments. These two ways of governing populations sit at opposite ends of the spectrum: 1) totalitarian systems work to dissolve individuals into the larger collective of the state and 2) libertarian systems celebrate individuals and their inherent rights -- these civil rights limit the state's ability to interfere in the lives of the individuals it governs.
Here are some of the Libertarian Party's positions on various social and political issues of our time. Read through them and respond to the questions I've asked at the end of the blog post.

1.0 Personal Liberty

Individuals should be free to make choices for themselves and to accept responsibility for the consequences of the choices they make. No individual, group, or government may initiate force against any other individual, group, or government. Our support of an individual's right to make choices in life does not mean that we necessarily approve or disapprove of those choices.

1.1 Expression and Communication

We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

1.2 Personal Privacy

Libertarians support the rights recognized by the Fourth Amendment to be secure in our persons, homes, and property. Protection from unreasonable search and seizure should include records held by third parties, such as email, medical, and library records. Only actions that infringe on the rights of others can properly be termed crimes. We favor the repeal of all laws creating “crimes” without victims, such as the use of drugs for medicinal or recreational purposes.

1.3 Personal Relationships

Sexual orientation, preference, gender, or gender identity should have no impact on the government's treatment of individuals, such as in current marriage, child custody, adoption,immigration or military service laws. Government does not have the authority to define, license or restrict personal relationships. Consenting adults should be free to choose their own sexual practices and personal relationships.

1.4 Abortion

Recognizing that abortion is a sensitive issue and that people can hold good-faith views on all sides, we believe that government should be kept out of the matter, leaving the question to each person for their conscientious consideration.

1.5 Crime and Justice

Government exists to protect the rights of every individual including life, liberty and property. Criminal laws should be limited to violation of the rights of others through force or fraud, or deliberate actions that place others involuntarily at significant risk of harm. Individuals retain the right to voluntarily assume risk of harm to themselves. We support restitution of the victim to the fullest degree possible at the expense of the criminal or the negligent wrongdoer. We oppose reduction of constitutional safeguards of the rights of the criminally accused. The rights of due process, a speedy trial, legal counsel, trial by jury, and the legal presumption of innocence until proven guilty, must not be denied. We assert the common-law right of juries to judge not only the facts but also the justice of the law.

1.6 Self-Defense

The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression. This right inheres in the individual, who may agree to be aided by any other individual or group. We affirm the individual right recognized by the Second Amendment to keep and bear arms, and oppose the prosecution of individuals for exercising their rights of self-defense.
We oppose all laws at any level of government requiring registration of, or restricting, the ownership, manufacture, or transfer or sale of firearms or ammunition.

2.0 Economic Liberty

Libertarians want all members of society to have abundant opportunities to achieve economic success. A free and competitive market allocates resources in the most efficient manner. Each person has the right to offer goods and services to others on the free market. The only proper role of government in the economic realm is to protect property rights, adjudicate disputes, and provide a legal framework in which voluntary trade is protected. All efforts by government to redistribute
wealth, or to control or manage trade, are improper in a free society.


2.1 Property and Contract

Property rights are entitled to the same protection as all other human rights. The owners of property have the full right to control, use, dispose of, or in any manner enjoy, their property without interference, until and unless the exercise of their control infringes the valid rights of others. We oppose all controls on wages, prices, rents, profits, production, and interest rates. We advocate the repeal of all laws banning or restricting the advertising of prices, products, or services. We oppose all violations of the right to private property, liberty of contract, and freedom of trade. The right to trade includes the right not to trade — for any reasons whatsoever. Where property, including land, has been taken from its rightful owners by the government or private action in violation of individual rights, we favor restitution to the rightful owners.


2.2 Environment

We support a clean and healthy environment and sensible use of our natural resources. Private landowners and conservation groups have a vested interest in maintaining natural resources. Pollution and misuse of resources cause damage to our ecosystem. Governments, unlike private businesses, are unaccountable for such damage done to our environment and have a terrible track record when it comes to environmental protection. Protecting the environment requires a clear definition and enforcement of individual rights in resources like land, water, air, and wildlife. Free markets and property rights stimulate the technological innovations and behavioral changes required to protect our environment and ecosystems. We realize that our planet's climate is constantly changing, but environmental advocates and social pressure are the most effective means of changing public behavior.

2.3 Energy and Resources

While energy is needed to fuel a modern society, government should not be subsidizing any particular form of energy. We oppose all government control of energy pricing, allocation, and production.

2.4 Government Finance and Spending

All persons are entitled to keep the fruits of their labor. We call for the repeal of the income tax, the abolishment of the Internal Revenue Service and all federal programs and services not required under the U.S. Constitution. We oppose any legal requirements forcing employers to serve as tax collectors. Government should not incur debt, which burdens future generations without their consent. We support the passage of a "Balanced Budget Amendment" to the U.S. Constitution, provided that the budget is balanced exclusively by cutting expenditures, and not by raising taxes.

2.5 Money and Financial Markets

We favor free-market banking, with unrestricted competition among banks and depository institutions of all types. Individuals engaged in voluntary exchange should be free to use as money any mutually agreeable commodity or item. We support a halt to inflationary monetary policies and unconstitutional legal tender laws.


2.6 Monopolies and Corporations

We defend the right of individuals to form corporations, cooperatives and other types of companies based on voluntary association. We seek to divest government of all functions that can be provided by non-governmental organizations or private individuals. We oppose government subsidies to business, labor, or any other special interest. Industries should be governed by free markets.

2.7 Labor Markets

We support repeal of all laws which impede the ability of any person to find employment. We oppose government-fostered forced retirement. We support the right of free persons to associate or not associate in labor unions, and an employer should have the right to recognize or refuse to recognize a union. We oppose government interference in bargaining, such as compulsory arbitration or imposing an obligation to bargain.

2.8 Education

Education, like any other service, is best provided by the free market, achieving greater quality and efficiency with more diversity of choice. Schools should be managed locally to achieve greater accountability and parental involvement. Recognizing that the education of children is inextricably linked to moral values, we would return authority to parents to determine the education of their children, without interference from government. In particular, parents should have control of and responsibility for all funds expended for their children's education.


2.9 Health Care

We favor restoring and reviving a free market health care system. We recognize the freedom of individuals to determine the level of health insurance they want, the level of health care they want, the care providers they want, the medicines and treatments they will use and all other aspects of their medical care, including end-of-life decisions. People should be free to purchase health
insurance across state lines.


2.10 Retirement and Income Security

Retirement planning is the responsibility of the individual, not the government. Libertarians would phase out the current government-sponsored Social Security system and transition to a private voluntary system. The proper and most effective source of help for the poor is the voluntary efforts of private groups and individuals. We believe members of society will become more charitable and civil society will be strengthened as government reduces its activity in this realm.

3.0 Securing Liberty

The protection of individual rights is the only proper purpose of government. Government is constitutionally limited so as to prevent the infringement of individual rights by the government itself. The principle of non-initiation of force should guide the relationships between governments.

3.1 National Defense

We support the maintenance of a sufficient military to defend the United States against aggression. The United States should both avoid entangling alliances and abandon its attempts to act as policeman for the world. We oppose any form of compulsory national service.

3.2 Internal Security and Individual Rights

The defense of the country requires that we have adequate intelligence to detect and to counter threats to domestic security. This requirement must not take priority over maintaining the civil liberties of our citizens. The Constitution and Bill of Rights shall not be suspended even during time of war. Intelligence agencies that legitimately seek to preserve the security of the nation must be subject to oversight and transparency. We oppose the government's use of secret classifications to keep from the public information that it should have, especially that which shows that the government has violated the law.

3.3 International Affairs

American foreign policy should seek an America at peace with the world. Our foreign policy should emphasize defense against attack from abroad and enhance the likelihood of peace by avoiding foreign entanglements. We would end the current U.S. government policy of foreign intervention, including military and economic aid. We recognize the right of all people to resist tyranny and defend themselves and their rights. We condemn the use of force, and especially the use of terrorism, against the innocent, regardless of whether such acts are committed by governments or by
political or revolutionary groups.

3.4 Free Trade and Migration

We support the removal of governmental impediments to free trade. Political freedom and escape from tyranny demand that individuals not be unreasonably constrained by government in the crossing of political boundaries. Economic freedom demands the unrestricted movement of human as well as financial capital across national borders. However, we support control over the entry into our country of foreign nationals who pose a credible threat to security, health or property.


3.5 Rights and Discrimination

We condemn bigotry as irrational and repugnant. Government should not deny or abridge any individual's rights based on sex, wealth, race, color, creed, age, national origin, personal habits, political preference or sexual orientation. Parents, or other guardians, have the right to raise their children according to their own standards and beliefs.

3.6 Representative Government

We support electoral systems that are more representative of the electorate at the federal, state and local levels. As private voluntary groups, political parties should be allowed to establish their own rules for nomination procedures, primaries and conventions. We call for an end to any tax-financed subsidies to candidates or parties and the repeal of all laws which restrict voluntary financing of election campaigns. We oppose laws that effectively exclude alternative candidates and parties, deny ballot access, gerrymander districts, or deny the voters their right to consider all legitimate alternatives.


3.7 Self-Determination

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive of individual liberty, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to agree to such new governance as to them shall seem most likely to protect their liberty.


Take a moment, reflect on, and respond to the questions below:

Which one (or more than one) of these Libertarian positions do you find unacceptable? Why do you find it unacceptable? Or, do you agree with all of them? What about these Libertarian positions do you find agreeable? Why do you like them?

How would a libertarian respond to the assassination of an American citizen by the US President?

39 comments:

  1. I think that Libertarian positions are easy to find acceptable because their main view point is for there to be as little government control as possible with the citizens making their own choices. However, I think that some of the positions contradict themselves. Position 1.0 on Personal Liberty states that they support individual right to make their own choices regardless if they agree or disagree with the outcome. However, in position 1.1 on Expression and Communication, it states that you are free to engage or abstain from any religious activities, as long as it does not affect another's rights. It should either always matter how an issue effects another, or never factor into the matter. Personally I think that a libertarian would not be fond of the assassination of an American citizen by the US President simply because in position 3.1 it states that the US should stop acting as policeman of the world and stop forming alliances.
    PSCI 100.02

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Michael Ryan Rodgers, PSCI 100.03
      I agree with this statement. Most of the libertarian views are simple and easy to agree with. In particular 1.3 regarding the governments involvement in personal relationships, and 2.4 regarding the allocation of funds.

      I also agree that libertarians would not agree with the assassination of American citizens.

      Delete
    2. Jordan Redmon PSCI 100.03October 18, 2012 at 2:19 PM

      I also agree with this. They make everything very easy to agree with which is why many people agree with it.

      Delete
    3. Savannah Snyder PSCI 100.02October 19, 2012 at 8:11 AM

      I agree with all of these comments. Libertarian views make it so people agree very easily with them. Although I do not believe that a libertarian government would be a good fit in the United States.

      Delete
    4. I agree with these comments as well because libertarians views make it very easy for people to agree with them! I do not think this type of government would be a good thing in the United States.

      Amber McFadden
      PSCI 100.02

      Delete
    5. Melissa Taylor PSCI 100.03
      I also agree with this point of view that libertarians veiws are relatively easy for people to agree and understand, and also that they agree with as little forms of government possible and to let the people choose and not so much all the politations in Washington.

      Delete
  2. I feel that libertarians would not cononde the assassination of an American citizen because of point 1.1. They do not want anyone, including th government, to infringe on anyone else's personal rights- and the right to live is one of the most personal rights we have. I disagree with point 2.2. I feel that the government should get involved with saving the enviroment- at least to a certain degree. Since everyone lives on this earth, I feel that it is everyone's duty to try to preserve our envirment. And one way that can be achieved is if the government steps in a bit and makes laws regarding the issue. If they stayed completely out of it and everyone relied on everyone else to do the right thing for the planet, then earth would be in trouble.
    I do however agree with most of the views libterarians take. I too agree that the government should stay out of the market place and that education could be better when in private markets; just look at private school versus public schools. Private schools offer a beter education than publuc schools can because of the certain requirements and restrictions they have to meet.

    100.03

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The problem is that not everyone can afford private school, and I don't know how that will change by taking away things like minimum wage. That's the thing about private schools: they don't have to take you.

      Delete
  3. I think that Libertarianism sounds excellent on paper, but could absolutely never work. They want free trade education? free trad health care? Free trade retirement funding? All without government regulations on the market at all? So, in a libertarian world, there would be no minimum wage, but they expect the working class citizens to plan for their own retirement without the help of the government?
    The libertarians do have some great ideas though. I like the idea of reigning in our policy of foreign intervention. At the same time, completely withdrawing from all alliances seems a little over the top. Isolationism has never worked, and certainly won't now considering how global everything is.
    The libertarian position on crime certainly would view murder of an American citizen as a crime. The problem comes with the decision on punishment. Aparantly the punishment should go no further than to repay the person who was wronged in full. Now this is entirely impossible. I presume that this does not mean that the murderer would go free. I would say that he might have to do service to the state for the good of the individuals, but what would he do? He couldn't work on the roads; that is not the government's responsibility. They probably wouldn't kill him, because that would be the government taking away one's right to life. They could imprison him, but that would require federal workers to guard him, unless it was a free market jail.
    In reality, the libertarians are probably counting on the fact that this won't happen. Firstly, since the free market means that everyone is happy and healthy in their work, because they have the ultimate freedom, than why would they murder someone? Also, since everyone might have a gun, no one with a gun will want to pull their gun, because they might get shot by someone else. I think the idea that the libertarians are going for is that things will be so black-and-white simple that things like murders just won't happen.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Megan Hart mwf 9:10-10:00October 16, 2012 at 12:33 PM

    I agree with some of the libertarian ideas but not all of them. In 1.6 Self-Defense i agree that you shouldn't get in trouble for self-defense but I think you should have to register to carry a gun and get a background check done because if not anyone can have a gun even a criminal. I agree with 1.0 everyone should be able to make choices themselves with out someone critizing them, the person who makes the choice is the one who deals with the consequences. I agree with 3.5 no one should be judged on their race, gender, who they choose to love etc... As great as libertarism sounds i don't think it would work, we could never get everyone to agree with it and even if you tell someone they can't judge a person they still will. I think if the president assassinated someone libertarions would say the government shouldn't get involved if he was defending himself then their is nothing wrong with it. The only thing i really don't agree with is having private schools, just because the school is private doesn't make it better then public school. Teachers and the students are what makes a school good or not.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I pretty much disagree with all of these views. We need government in our society. We need limits, as well as protection. Without laws, everything would be free will and left to the people. That would be a dangerous society. Although, I do agree with 3.5-Rights and Discrimination. We all should be treated equally. Also, having the right to free market health care would be a better medical insurance system. I agree with 1.3 and 1.2. individuals personal rights should have no connection whatsoever with the government. Those rights should be kept confidential.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I defiantly agree that we need protection as a society and it would be a dangerous thing if we all were to make our own decisions because there are some crazy fools out there who can't fend for themselves!

      Delete
  6. I find that for the most part all the Libertarian positions are acceptable. In an ideal world all of the positions could be implied as stated and the world would be a happy place, unfortunately it will not work like that. For example, the Libertarian view on International Affairs wouldn'd be as easy as stated. America could not just let down the countries that is helps to protect. That would for sure cause those countries to attack us and by breaking these alliances we would have no one to help us. Other than the idea that starting a Libertarian government in America now with the condition that it is in would only make it worse, i do agree with most of the Libertarian views. At this point in America, it would be impossible to switch to a Libertarian government without doing more harm than good to the country.

    Jena Wright
    PSCI 100.3
    TR

    ReplyDelete
  7. I agree with libertarianism overall. I feel that there is more of a focus on protecting our rights as humans and working towards a better quality of life in general. It holds people accountable to themselves and wouldn't waste the tax dollars of the people on punishing those who only act in ways that don't effect property or others, such as drug use.

    ReplyDelete
  8. I don't agree with 1.6 when it says, "We oppose all laws at any level of government requiring registration of, or restricting, the ownership, manufacture, or transfer or sale of firearms or ammunition." This to me means that we would have no idea how many guns were in the country, who had these guns, and anyone including people like the DC sniper could own multiple guns without anyone's knowledge. I don't agree with 3.4 because it basically states that anyone can cross over borders and come here. It says, "we support control over the entry into our country of foreign nationals who pose a credible threat to security, health or property." To me, it's too late to control it once you've realized that it poses a threat. I believe that the freedom allowed to citizens according to the libertarian policies is important as far as keeping people happy. It seems like that kind of government doesn't want to step on anyone's toes and therefore doesn't really act like a government. They have very little involvement and it seems that there motto is, "do what you want just don't be violent."
    Paige Albert
    PSCI 100.03

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with Paige. They just want to keep the population of the country happy without always doing what is best for them. I think with these laws there is too much self-governning going on and I don't think everything could run smoothly without structure. There is always going to be violence in the world, giving more freedom to the citizens of their counry isn't going to lessen that possibility.

      Emily Rogers
      PSCI 100.03 TR 12:25

      Delete
    2. I also don't agree with 1.6 about how we have no idea how many guns are being sold in the country and to people who shouldn't have guns. This causes many problems with gang related violence and people like the sniper shooters. There is going to violence no matter what type of laws the government makes.

      Anthony Varbero
      PSCI 100:03 TR 12:25

      Delete
    3. Violence is something that can never be stopped. There are people in this world who enjoy breaking laws. Guns can be sold to anyone if they are not registerd. that is why it is easy to commit crimes with assualt weapons. the gun law has become very strict in many different states, but that is why i also agree that will not change the crime rate very much at all.

      Branden McLean
      PSCI 100:03 TR 12:25

      Delete
  9. I agree with the ideas of a Libertarian as a whole. No matter what the policies are, each will have a good and bad about them. I feel like in a Libertarian's case, since they want "good" extreme freedom there will be "bad" extreme side effects. We keep creating all these policies to fix the bad side effects of others. Its not going to work! Human nature has it's faults and we have to deal with it. Half of me wants to sit back and laugh at the stupidity of so many American citizens. We all want this "change" but you're to damn afraid of it actually happening. Maybe I am wrong, I'm not sure. Why not give a Libertarian a chance to run American? We let Obama. What is there to lose? Money? Freedom? Family? Life? I guess I ask myself what I'm willing to lose for what I believe in. I'm way off topic now but oh well.

    Cody Barrett
    PSCI 100.02

    ReplyDelete
  10. Elaina Feliciano MWF PSCI 100.03October 19, 2012 at 1:39 PM

    I agree with all of them! I especially agree that women should have the right to choose whether or not to make their own stance on abortion and I agree that other peoples sexual orientation is no one elses buisness. I believe that telling a women she cant get an abortion is like telling her shes to dumb to make her own desicions about her body. Were all so scared of what a libertarian party has to offer because we think its to much freedom but, in a society where it seems like ur rights are constantly being limited than i think that this is the way to go. As far as dealing with the assasination of an american citizen by the US president. I think that this would in fact be a crime but how would they deal out the punishment when the person that has done it is in almost complete control. I feel like in a libertarian society they would deal out a punishment that fits the nature of the crime.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. i agree with this statement the most due to the fact that you are entitled to make your own decisions about your body. If you choose to get an abortion then you should be able to. Abortion however, should be taken into consideration and only on certain circumstances. The government has no right to take this from a women to decide on her own.

      Summer Fitzwater
      MWF 100.02

      Delete
  11. Over all I agree with the Libertarian laws because I like the idea where people have more control over their lives as opposed to a government who always wants to be in control. However, I do believe that people should have more of a protection barrier than what the Libertarian laws are offering. I like the fact that these laws are all about people choosing for themselves, but there are some people out there who are unable to choose for themselves so it must be done for them. For example, section 2.9 states that people should have the right to choose which level of health insurance they want, the level of medicine and medical treatments they need even in a end of life decision. I don't agree with this particulary because some people are unable to choose for themselves. A lot of people in this world now are unaware of the health care they need or unaware of a medical treatment they need so it would be wrong to make an individual choose on this matter when they have no idea what they are about to make a decision on. One issue that I do agree 100% with is section 1.4, stating that women have the right to choose if they want to get an abortion and government should stay out of it! Its easy to say that all these views are wonderful but really people are insanely stupid and I feel as if all this freedom was given complete chaos would defiantly amount. If we didn't have stupid people in this world than i think this type of government would be great, but thats just not the case. As far as the assassination of an American citizen by the US President, I feel as if nothing would be done. Because section 1.6 states that "The only legitimate use of force is in defense of individual rights — life, liberty, and justly acquired property — against aggression". The president could easily say he was protecting himself against that individual because he proposed some type of aggression towards him. Its not like he would get in trouble for being armed because your allowed to be armed with a firearm at all times without a permit in this type of government.

    Mariah Bacon
    910-10 mwf

    ReplyDelete
  12. Carlos Canino PSCI 100.02October 20, 2012 at 4:27 PM

    I can agree with most of the positions libertarians would abide by, except the education portion. Most people don't want government or anyone over their shoulder to watch or mandate anything. I can only imagine if it wasn't required by law for children to attend school, what society would be like. Its already kinda sad now how oblivious or how uneducated some people are like now with the required education law we live with. Most people want their cake and eat it too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree with Carlos on this, with the way education is now it is very sad how uneducated the children are about a lot of things. I am studying to be a teacher and to read the articles about education it is very sad to me. We don't want the government watching over us but in a way they already are.
      Alicia Clark
      PSCI 100.02

      Delete
  13. Based on the views listed above, it is easy to tell that Libertarians want as little of government control as possible. Of those views, many seem to contradict each other. For example, the Personal Liberties one talks about how the Libertarians supports individuals, but in the Expression and Communication, it talks about how it wants people to feel free to speak but don’t want it bothering others. As for how Libertarians would feel about the assassination of an American citizen, they would be very upset because the government got involved.
    Sarah Myers
    100.03

    ReplyDelete
  14. Ashlee Barrett PSCI 100.02October 21, 2012 at 8:32 AM

    Overall, I completely agree with the Libertarians. YOU decide what you want to do with your body and the decisions that you make. If those decisions are not harming others, there is no reason why it should be stopped. However, if it is harming yourself, you are due to accept full responsibility of your actions. I think now days, too many people rely on "insanity pleas" or other "easy way outs". Also, they want all people to achieve economic success. If our country wanted this, and strived for it, I believe we would be in a much better position overall. So for the most part, I agree with pretty much everything that libertarians stand for and I believe that if our country followed these guidelines, the USA would be much better off. However, I do think that we need some sort of protection from society. Not every human being is going to know or be comfortable with defending themselves. So with this, as with every other idea, there are good and bad. But in my opinion, there are many more good.

    Ashlee Barrett PSCI 100.02

    ReplyDelete
  15. Phillip Rhoden MWF 9:10-10October 21, 2012 at 1:13 PM

    i think mostly all men would find the libertarians positions acceptable because of the fact that the government does not have much control over their personal lives anymore. however,i think libertarians are close minded to the fact that establishing a strong government is the best way to run a diverse society. I agree with the libertarian view but i also realize what it takes to control a country which is a strong government because too much free will result in too much uncontrolled chaos.

    ReplyDelete
  16. In my opinion anyone would agree with these libertian views. Most of them are allowing people to make all the choices and to me like everyone i want to choose what happens to me or have the right to choose what i can an cant do. I do not think this would be a good goverment though. I really think it wouldnt work for the simple fact that everyone thinks and has there on opinion which with out our government i think would be alot of conflict. So, i dont agree with these points even though i like them.
    David Gladden t-th 12:35-1:40 100.03

    ReplyDelete
  17. Brian Fletcher, MWF 9:10October 21, 2012 at 5:20 PM

    This is very true, there is no way that everyone would cooperate with each other and gather together to accomplish anything. The government needs to be in control of many of the major operations to keep them safe or from screwing over someone else. If the government didnt have the same control that it does now over certain aspects of this country then there is a chance of anarchy

    ReplyDelete
  18. Angela Raco, TR 12:25-1:40October 21, 2012 at 6:26 PM

    There are some libertarian views that I do agree with, however the majority of them I do not agree with. I believe that without structure and enforcement, our society would fail. It would create for a dangerous place for all citizens, and most people would become too comfortable with creating their limits. That is what is wrong with our nation today; people think they can do what they want because they think it is for the best, when it actually isn’t. Yet they are quick to point out and complain when another person does the same thing. I agree with rights 1.2 and 1.3 because that is a person’s own rights and in my opinion does not affect anyone else.
    PSCI 03

    ReplyDelete
  19. Though some of these laws look like a great thing on paper, the reality is would these laws work well with our society today? There are so many "norms" that some of these dramatic changes would be difficult for people to get used to. One libertarian law that stands out to me that i find unacceptable is 2.3 - Energy and Resources. If we didnt have a goverment contol over fuel, there would be more likely of a chance we would run out. Though the nice thing is that it could potentially be cheaper or it could be more exspensive than it is now. I feel out of all the laws, this one stands out the most to me. The law that I like the most is the self defense law. It just states you have your right to protect yourself by any means, but only to protect and not to keep going after the protection is finished. And if a citizen was killed by the President, i think it would depend on why they were killed.

    Jordan Rodriguez
    PSCI 100.02

    ReplyDelete
  20. I believe that Libertarian views are extremely easy to accept. Many of their views surround the idea that people can make their own choices. The government control on the citizens is almost inexistent. They support giving the individual the right to make their own choices. This seems like a great way to govern. However, many choices people make these days can have costly effects.

    Paul Hvozdovic
    PSCI 100.02

    ReplyDelete
  21. I favor most of the Libertarian Party's positions. Libertarians truely allow individualism amd limited government interference. The topic of libertarianism makes me wonder how society would be with less government interference in our personal lives. The positions of Libertarians sound good, but they do sound too good to ever happen. Personally, I do not feel like there is anything wrong with government interference as long as its not excessive, because it does keep order in our lives. The positions that I liked the most were "PersonalRelationships", "Abortion", and "Rights and Discrimination". When the government limits those certain things they limit individuality, a right for a person to make their own choices, and a person's ability to be human.

    Cher'ie L. Dixon
    PSCI 100.02
    MWF 9:10-10:00

    ReplyDelete
  22. I do find that most of these views do match up with my own views of the way the government should be, however the one that does stand out to me was the 1.6 Self Defense, I agreed with everything except I believe that there should be stricter gun sale and registration laws, I think that it is necessary to track crimes and therefore our firearms should be registered and documented. Another that I do not agree with is 2.10 Retirement and Income Security, I beleive that it is the responsibility of the young to take care of the elderly in there community, and though it is all great to say that everyone should be responsible for themselves and plan ahead not everybody has the option of saving money.
    Melissa Stover
    PSCI 100
    TTH 12:25

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I completely agree with you on the stricter laws for gun sale. I don't think you should be able to sell a gun to just anyone that comes in and registers.

      McKena Munson
      PSCI 100.03

      Delete
  23. After reading all of the Libertarian views, there aren't really any that I find overly objectionable, at least enough so to find them "unacceptable."
    The only one I have an issue with is the use of force, but I'm not exactly sure what that means. Does that literally mean the use of force as in the use of violence to enforce laws or does force simply mean government interference? Because I don't like the idea of having to use force as in violence, but I do support the government being able to intervene.
    However, I am very much in favor of the Libertarian stance on abortion, personal relationships, and the environment. I am in favor of them because I believe that the government has no business in those first two issues in the first place, and that the environment needs to be protected by everyone, not just the government.
    Veronica Victor
    PSCI 03 TTH 12:25

    ReplyDelete
  24. I agree with most of the Libertarian view but not all. I believe that people should be able to live their lives freely but from previous history; we need a little structure in our lives. We need the government to guide us in the right direction. 1.6 on Self Defense, gun laws should be more strict.

    McKena Munson
    PSCI 100.03

    ReplyDelete
  25. I believe that everyone/anyone could easily agree with these Libertarian positions. It is more convincing to the public to allow them to do whatever they want to do. I agree and disagree with this concept. Agree, if the decisions an individual makes is harmless to others. Disagree, because society would take this concept way out of hand and there would be no organization. People would stretch the limitations. We need the protection, structure, and enforcement to keep the society safe. I see some people that think they can live the way they want and do whatever they want to do. Others, think they know what's best, but really it's not. The rights that actually seem right are 1.2 and 1.3. People have their own rights, but these rights do not have an effect on others.

    Lauren Williams
    PSCI 100.03

    ReplyDelete